اثرمحلول‌پاشی عناصر منگنز و روی بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دانه لوبیاقرمز (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)تحت شرایط خشکی

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین

2 دانشگاه شهرکرد

3 مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان چهارمحال و بختیاری

چکیده

به‌منظور مطالعة اثر محلول‌پاشی عناصر منگنز و روی بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دانه‌ی لوبیاقرمز
(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)در شرایط خشکی آزمایشی در مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی شهرکرد به‌صورت اسپلیت پلات فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه‌تکرار اجرا شد. تنش خشکی به‌عنوان فاکتور اصلی شامل سه‌سطح S1، S2و S3 (به‌ترتیب آبیاری پس از 50، 70 و 90‌میلی‌متر تبخیر از تشت کلاس A) و فاکتور فرعی شامل ترکیب فاکتوریل محلول‌پاشی عناصر منگنز و روی، هر کدام در سه‌سطح شامل محلول‎پاشی با ‌آب‌مقطر، محلول‌پاشی 5/1 در هزار و محلول‌پاشی 3 در هزار از منابع ‌سولفات‌منگنز و ‌سولفات‌روی بود. نتایج ‌نشان‌داد که تنش خشکی اثر معنی‌داری بر کلیة صفات مورد‌بررسی داشت و بیشترین مقادیر تعداد غلاف در بوته (2/14)، عملکرد دانه (4/3172‌کیلوگرم در هکتار) و عملکرد بیولوژیک (1/9124‌کیلوگرم در هکتار) مربوط به تیمار S1بود؛درحالی‌که بیشترین مقادیر تعداد دانه در غلاف (7/4)، وزن صَد‌دانه (۲۶گرم) و شاخص برداشت (4/36) در تیمار S2به‌دست آمد. کمترین مقادیر صفات اندازه‌گیری‌شده در تیمارS3مشاهده شد؛ به‌نحوی‌که تعداد غلاف در بوته (۵)، تعداد دانه در غلاف (6/3)، وزن صَد‌دانه (4/21گرم)، عملکرد دانه (5/774کیلوگرم در هکتار)، عملکرد بیولوژیک (7/5451کیلوگرم در هکتار) و شاخص برداشت (6/13) نسبت به تیمار شاهد به‌ترتیب به‌میزان 8/64، ۲۰، 6/12، 6/75، 2/40 و 8/60درصد کاهش یافتند. اثر سادة محلول‌پاشی عناصر منگنز و روی نیز در مورد کلیة صفات، به‌جُز شاخص برداشت و وزن دانه معنی‌دار و متناسب با افزایش مصرف عناصر مورد‌بررسی، از روند افزایشی برخوردار بود، به‌نحوی‌که عملکرد دانه در تیمارهای محلول‌پاشی ۳ در هزار منگنز و روی نسبت به تیمار شاهد به‌ترتیب به‌میزان 3/36 و 2/28درصد افزایش یافت. بررسی اثرات متقابل نیز ‌نشان‌داد که در شرایط تنش خشکی محلول‌پاشی منگنز اثر مساعد‌تری نسبت به محلول‌پاشی روی در مورد صفات تعداد غلاف در بوته و عملکرد دانه داشت. به‌طورکلی اگرچه محلول‌پاشی منگنز و روی سبب افزایش عملکرد دانه‌ گردید، اما در شرایط تنش خشکی، محلول‌پاشی منگنز تأثیر بهتری در تخفیف اثرات سوء تنش خشکی داشت.

واژه‌های کلیدی: تغذیة گیاه، حبوبات، شاخص برداشت، عناصر کم‌مصرف، کم‌آبیاری

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of foliar application of Manganese and Zinc on grain yield and yield components of Red Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in drought conditions

نویسندگان [English]

  • morteza jamshidi 1
  • Abdolrazagh Danesh-Shahraki 2
  • Seyed Mojtaba Hashemi-Jazi 3
1 Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Ramin
2 Shahrekord University
3 Research Center of Agricultural and Natural Resources of Chaharmahal-e- Bakhtiari
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Grain legumes are considered as the second source of human nutrition after cereals and play an important role in community food supply, sustainable agriculture and economic profitability. Among grain legumes, common bean has the most consumption in the world compared with others. However there are always some constraints in common bean production and drought is most important factor in yield reduction of this crop. In addition high sensitivity of common bean to some micronutrients shortage such as manganese and zinc is another limiting factor that will be exacerbated in drought conditions. In such situation foliar application could be considered as a suitable strategy to facilitate the absorption of these micronutrients by plant.

Materials and Methods
In order to study the effect of foliar application of manganese and zinc on grain yield and yield components of Red Bean(Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in drought conditions the experiment was carried out at research station of agriculture and natural resources research center of ShahreKord as a split plot factorial design in basis randomized complete block with three replications. Drought stress considered as main factor including S1, S2 and S3 (irrigation after 50, 70 and 90 mm of cumulative evaporation from Class A pan respectively) and subplots were the factorial combination of Manganese and zinc foliar application both with three levels including foliar application of distilled water, 150 ppm and 300 ppm from manganese sulfate and zinc sulfate resources respectively. Sowing date was May 27, 2010 and each experimental plot was included of 4 rows with 50 cm apart and 4 m long. Between main plots a m-2 wide strip was left bare to eliminate influences of lateral water movement. According to soil test 100 kg.ha-1 N was used in the form of urea (50 kg.ha-1 N before sowing and 50 kg.ha-1 N before flowering) by hand broadcasting method. Irrigation was done every 5 days and Drought stress treatments along with foliar application treatments were applied at V 4 (Third trifoliate leaf appearance) crop growth stage. During the growth season, weeds and pests were controlled. At the harvesting time (15th to 26th September) 1 square meter of each plot in different treatments was harvested and grain yield, number of pod per plant, number of seed per pod, 100 seed weight, biological yield and harvest index were investigated.Data analysis performed by SAS software and mean comparisons were done using the least significant difference test at 5% probability by MSTAT-C software.

Results and Discussion
The results showed that drought had a significant effect on all investigated traits and the highest values of pod number per plant (14.2), grain yield (3172.4 kg.ha-1) and biological yield (9124.1 kg.ha-1) were related to S1 treatment, whereas the highest values of seed number per pod (4.7), 100 seed weight (26 gr) and harvest index (36.4) were obtained in S2 treatment. The lowest values of all traits were observed in S3 treatment, so that pod number per plant (5), seed number per pod (3.6), 100 seed weight (21.4 gr), grain yield (774.5 kg.ha-1), biological yield (5451.7 kg.ha-1) and harvest index (13.6) decreased by 64.8, 20, 12.6, 75.6, 40.2 and 60.8 percent respectively compared with control. The simple effects of foliar application of Mn and Zn in all investigated traits except harvest index and weight of 100 seed were significant and these traits increased with increasing in application of micronutrients amount. So that grain yield in 300 ppm of Mn and Zn foliar application treatments increased 36.3% and 28.2% respectively compared with control. Investigation of interaction effects of treatments showed that in severe drought stress condition foliar application of Mn had a better effect than Zn on number of pod per plant and grain yield.The positive effects of Mn and Zn micronutrients might be attributed to the favorable influence of them on metabolism and their stimulating effect on photosynthetic pigments and enzyme activity which in turn encourage growth and yield.

Conclusion
Generally, however foliar application of Mn and Zn caused to grain yield increasing but in drought stress Mn had a better effect in drought impacts alleviation and could be considered as an applied method for yield improvement of common bean in water deficit conditions.

Key words: Deficit irrigation, Grain legume, Harvest index, Micronutrients, Plant nutrient management

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Deficit irrigation
  • Grain legume
  • Harvest index
  • Micronutrients
  • Plant nutrient management

مراجع

1. Abd El-Monem, M.S., Ibrahim, I.F., and Mahmoud, R.S. 2009. Response of Broad bean and Lupin plants to foliar treatment with Boron and Zinc. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 3(3): 2226-2231.
2. Ahmadi, M. 2010. Effect of Zinc and Nitrogen fertilizer rates on yield and yield components of oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.). World Applied Sciences Journal 10(3): 298-303.
3. Alloway, B.J. 2008. Zinc in Soils and Crop Nutrition. IZA Publications. International Zinc Association, Brussels.
4. Bourgault, M., Madramootoo, C.A., Webber, H.A., Dutilleul, P., Stulina, G., Horst, M.G., and Smith, D.L. 2013. Legume production and irrigation strategies in the Aral sea basin: yield, yield components, water relations and crop development of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and Mungbean (Vigna radiate (L.) Wilczek). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 199(4): 241-252.
5. Broughton, W.J., Hernandez, G., Blair, M., Beebe, S., Gepts, P., and Vanderleyden, J. 2003. Beans (Phaseolus spp.) model food legumes. Plant and Soil 252: 55-128.
6. Calvache, M., Reichardt, K., Bacchp, O.O.S., and Dourado-Neto, D. 1997. Deficit irrigation at different growth stages of the Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., cv. Imbabello). Scientia Agricola(Piracicaba, Braz.) 54: 1-16.
7. Ebrahim, M.K.H., and Aly, M.M. 2004. Physiological response of wheat to foliar application of Zinc and inoculation with some bacterial fertilizers. Journal of Plant Nutrition27(10): 1859-1874.
8. Fageria, N.K., Barbosa Filho, M.P., Moreira, A., and Guimaraes, C.M. 2009. Foliar fertilization of crop plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition32: 1044-1064.
9. FAO. Available at Web Site http://faostat3.fao.org/2013/faostat/
10. Ghasemian, V., Ghalavand, A., Sorooshzadeh, A., and Pirzad, A. 2010. The Effect of Iron, Zinc and Manganese on quality and quantity of soybean seed. Journal of Phytology 2(11): 73-79.
11. Gupta, U.C., Kening, W., and Siyuan, L. 2008. Micronutrients in soils, crops, and livestock. Frontiers of Earth Science 15(5): 110-125.
12. Habibi, G. 2011. Influence of drought on yield and yield components in white bean. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 5:169-178.
13. Hu, Y., Burucs, Z., and Schmidhalter, U. 2008. Effect of foliar fertilization application on the growth and mineral nutrient content of maize seedling under drought and salinity. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science54:133-141.
14. Karimi, M., Mousavi, S.F., and Heidarzadeh, M. 1990. Rapid measurement of soil water by gravimetric method. Iran Agricultural Research 9:65-73.
15. Lipiec, J., Doussan, C., Nosalewicz, A., and Kondracka, K. 2013. Effect of drought and heat stresses on plant growth and yield: a review. International Agrophysics Journal 27: 463-477.
16. Machado Neto, N.B., and Duraes, M.A.B. 2006. Physiological and biochemical response of common bean varieties treated with salicylic acid under water stress. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 6: 269-277.
17. Mady, M.A., 2009. Effect of foliar application with yeast extract and zinc on fruit setting and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Biological, Chemical & Environmental Science 4(2): 109-127.
18. Mahlouji, M., Mousavi, S.F., and Karimi, M. 2000. Effect of water stress and planting date on grain yield and yield components of Pinto Bean. Journal of Science & Technology of Agriculture & Natural Resources 4(1):57-67. (In Persian).
19. Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2ndEd. Academic, London.
20. Martinez, J.P., Silva, H., Ledent, J.F., and Pinto, M. 2007. Effect of drought stress on the osmotic adjustment, cell wall elasticity and cell volume of six cultivars of common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). European Journal of Agronomy 26: 30-38.
21. Mousavi, S.R., Shahsavari, M., and Rezaie, M. 2011. A general overview on Manganese (Mn) importance for crops production. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences5(9):1799-1803.
22. MovahedyDehnavy, M., ModarresSanavy, S.A.M., and MokhtassiBidgoli, A. 2009. Foliar application of zinc and manganese improves seed yield and quality of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) grown under water deficit stress. Industrial Crops and Products 30: 82-99.
23. Nunez Barrios, B.A., Hoogenboom, G., and Nesmith, D.S. 2005. Drought stress and the distribution of vegetative and reproductive traits of a bean cultivar. Scientia Agricola (Piracicaba, Braz.) 62(1): 18-22.
24. Ozbahce, A., and Zengin, M. 2011. Effects of manganese fertilizers on yield and yield components of dwarf dry bean. Journal of Plant Nutrition 34: 127-139.
25. Schoonhoven, A.V., and Pastor-Corrales, M.A. 1987. Standard System for the Evaluation of Bean Germplasm. CIAT, Cali, Colombia.
26. Szilagyi, L. 2003. Influence of drought on seed yield components in common bean. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology Special Issue: 320-330.
27. Teixeira, I.R., Borem, A., and Araujo, G.A.A. 2004. Manganese and zinc leaf application on common bean grown on a cerrado soil. Scientia Agricola (Piracicaba, Braz.) 61(1): 77-81.
28. Togay, N., Ciftci, V., and Togay, Y. 2004. The Effect of Zinc fertilization on yield and some yield components of dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 3(6): 701-704.
29. Valenciano, J.B., Miguelez-Frade, M.M., Marcelo, V., and Reinoso, B. 2007. Response of irrigated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) yield to foliar zinc application in Spain. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science35: 325-330.
30. Zeidan, M.S., Mohamed, M.F., and Hamouda, H.A. 2010. Effect of foliar fertilization of Fe, Mn and Zn on wheat yield and quality in low sandy soils fertility. World Journal of Agricultural Science 6(6): 696-699.
31. Faisal Elgasim, A., and Abdel Shakoor, H.S. 2010. Effect of water stress applied at different stages of growth on seed yield and water-use efficiency of cowpea. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 1(4): 534-540.
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار