ارزیابی پایداری عملکرد دانه ژنوتیپ‎های پیشرفته عدس (Lens culinaris Medik) براساس شاخص‎های مبتنی بر مدل‎های AMMI ،BLUP و MGIDI

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

پیام پزشکپور ¹

رضا امیری ¹

امیر میرزایی ²

اصغر مهربان ³

امین نامداری ⁴

¹ بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان لرستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، خرم‎آباد، ایران

² بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان ایلام، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، ایلام، ایران

³ بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی و باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی اردبیل، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، مغان، ایران

⁴ مؤسسه تحقیقات کشاورزی دیم کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، گچساران، ایران

10.22067/ijpr.2025.91978.1105

چکیده

عدس (Lens culinaris Medik) به‌واسطه درصد پروتئین و ارزش تغذیه‎ای زیاد، یکی از حبوبات مهم محسوب می‎شود. این پژوهش برای شناسایی ژنوتیپ‎های پایدار و پرمحصول عدس اجرا گردید. در این پژوهش، 14 ژنوتیپ پیشرفته عدس همراه با دو رقم شاهد گچساران و سپهر در قالب طرح بلوک‎های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار، در ایستگاه‎های تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی سراب چنگائی خرم‎آباد، گچساران و ایلام به مدت دو سال زراعی (1400-1402)، و در ایستگاه مغان به مدت یک سال زراعی (1400-1401) مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. نتایج نمودار موزائیکی نشان داد که سهم مجموع مربعات ژنوتیپ و برهم‌کنش ژنوتیپ در محیط در مجموع مربعات کل به‎ترتیب 20/2 و 19/43 درصد بود. آزمون نسبت درست‎نمایی نشان داد که برهم‌کنش ژنوتیپ در محیط بر عملکرد دانه، وزن 100 دانه، ارتفاع بوته، روز تا گل‌دهی، سرعت پُر شدن دانه، بهره‎وری از بارش و وزن تک دانه معنی‎دار بود. آزمون اسکری نشان داد که دو مؤلفه اصلی اولیه، سهم قابل توجهی در توجیه برهم‌کنش ماتریس ژنوتیپ در محیط داشتند، به‎طوری که مؤلفه اصلی اول و دوم به‎ترتیب 4/44 و 2/32 درصد از تغییرات برهم‌کنش ژنوتیپ در محیط را توجیه کردند. در مجموع، براساس نتایج کل روش‎ها و انتخاب همزمان براساس پایداری عملکرد دانه و همه صفات اندازه‎گیری‌شده، ژنوتیپ‎های شماره 4، 2، 13، 14، 1، 7 و 10 ژنوتیپ‎هایی پایدار و برتر نسبت به میانگین کل ژنوتیپ‎ها بودند. صفات سرعت تشکیل عملکرد دانه، بهره‎وری از بارش و ارتفاع بوته بیشترین تأثیر را بر عملکرد دانه داشتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

پایداری چندصفتی

تجزیه مقادیر منفرد

گزینش همزمان

نمودار گرمایی

نمودار موزائیکی

موضوعات

• بِه‌نژادی و بیوتکنولوژی

---

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of Seed Yield Stability of Advanced Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) Genotypes using the AMMI, BLUP, and MGIDI Indices

نویسندگان English

Payam Pezeshkpour ¹

Reza Amiri ¹

Amir Mirzaei ²

Asghar Mehraban ³

Amin Namdari ⁴

¹ Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Khorramabad, Iran

² Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Ilam Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Ilam, Iran

³ Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Mughan, Iran

⁴ Dryland Agricultural Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Gachsaran, Iran

چکیده English

Introduction
Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) is considered one of the most important legumes due to its protein content and high nutritional value. Its yield, like that of other crops, is an important and challenging trait for genetic improvement, because it is influenced by various factors that have detrimental effects on seed yield and traits related to seed quality. One of the key aspects in plant breeding studies is the understanding of the interaction between genotypes and different environments. The existence of genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) in field trials of many crop plants indicates that yield stability, along with high average yield, should be considered as an important aspect of yield comparison trials. The aim of the present study was to determine stable and high-yielding lentil genotypes across different environments using various stability indices.
 
Materials and Methods
In this study, fourteen advanced lentil genotypes along with two check cultivars (Gachsaran and Sepehr) were evaluated based on a randomized complete blocks design with three replications at Khorramabad, Gachsaran, and Ilam Agricultural Research Stations for two cropping seasons (2020-2022), and at the Mughan Station for one crop year (2020-2021). Seeds were sown with a Wintersteiger research seeder in four rows, each 4 m long, with 25 cm spacing between rows (plot area of 4 m²). Weed control was carried out using a hand cultivator in two stages during the vegetative growth period. Before harvesting, the two outer rows and 0.5 m from both ends of the two central rows were discarded, and the remaining area of each plot (1.5 m²) was harvested manually and grain yield was calculated. Grain yield, 100 seed weight, plant height, days to flowering, days to maturity, kernel filling period, kernel filling rate, rain water productivity, seed yield formation rate, and weight of single seed were measured in all seven environments for each genotype. All statistical analyses were performed using GGE and the multi-environmental analysis package “metan” in R software.
 
Results and Discussion
The mosaic diagram showed that the contribution of the sum of squares of genotype and the genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) in the total sum of squares was 2.2 and 43.19%, respectively. The likelihood ratio test showed that the genotype by environment interaction was significant on grain yield, 100-grain weight, plant height, days to flowering, kernel filling rate, rain water productivity, and weight of single seed. The Scree test showed that the first two principal components had a significant contribution to the GEI matrix derived from BLUP, as the first and second principal components explained 44.4% and 32.2% of the GEI variation, respectively. The predicted grain yield means using BLUP method indicated that the highest predicted yield using BLUP method was for genotype 2, followed by genotypes 7, 14, 6, 10, 12, 1 and 4, all of which showed predicted yields higher than the overall mean. Genotypes 12, 1 and 4 had predicted yield very close to the average, and the lowest predicted yield with a large distance from the total average was related to genotypes 15, 3 and 9 (Gachsaran). Factor analysis based on the traits measured in the studied genotypes showed that four main components remained in the model, and the cumulative variance of these four components was 91.85%. For grain yield, the genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) coefficient of explanation and average genotypic heritability were 0.4319 and 0.2065, respectively. The accuracy of genotype selection and the correlation between genotype values ​​across environments were 0.454 and 0.442, respectively. Also, the genotypic coefficient of variation, the residual coefficient of variation, and the ratio of these two coefficients of variation were 4.48%, 21.9%, and 0.204, respectively. The traits of grain yield formation rate, rain water productivity, and plant height showed the greatest contribution to seed yield.
 
Conclusions
In general, the results showed that the genotype-by-environment interaction was significant on grain yield, 100-seed weight, plant height, days to flowering, days to maturity, grain filling period, grain filling rate, grain yield formation rate, rain water productivity, and single grain weight. Overall, based on the results of all methods and simultaneous selection for grain yield stability and associated traits, genotypes 4, 2, 13, 14, 1, 7, and 10 were identified as stable and superior to the average of all genotypes. Notably, genotype 2 outperformed the others, with a grain yield of 969 kg ha⁻¹, plant height of 46.6 cm, seed yield formation rate of 63.6 kg ha⁻¹ day⁻¹, and rainwater productivity of 82.2 kg mm⁻¹, exceeding the average values across all measured traits in this study.
 
Acknowledgement
Financial support for this research (approved code: 00-59-15-018-001055) is from the Dryland Agriculture Research Institute (DARI), Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran.We would like to express our gratitude to the Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Heatmap plot

Mosaic plot

Multi-trait stability

Simultaneous selection

Single value decomposition

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

مراجع

Al-Ashkar, I., Sallam, M., Almutairi, K. F., Shady, M., Ibrahim, A., & Alghamdi, S. S. (2023). Detection of high-performance wheat genotypes and genetic stability to determine complex interplay between genotypes and environments. Agronomy, 13(2), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020585

Amin, M. N., Islam, M. M., Coyne, C. J., Carpenter-Boggs, L., & McGee, R. J. (2024). Spectral indices for characterizing lentil accessions in the dryland of Pacific Northwest. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 71(1), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-023-01614-8

Bermejo, C., Cazzola, F., Maglia, F., & Cointry, E. (2020). Selection of parents and estimation of genetic parameters using BLUP and molecular methods for lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) breeding program in Argentina. Experimental Agriculture, 56(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479719000061

Biçer, B. T., Kızılgeçi, F., Albayrak, Ö., Akinci C., & Yıldırım, M. (2018). Stability parameters in lentil genotypes. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering, 5(2), 287-291. https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.403995

Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003). Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology, 30(3), 239-264. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02076

Dastfall, M., Najafi Mirak, T., & Zali, H. (2024). Selection of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) genotypes tolerant to terminal season drought stress using multi-trait indices (MGIDI). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 25(4), 342-361. (In Persian).

Dehghani, H., Sabaghpour, S. H., & Sabaghnia, N. (2008). Genotype × environment interaction for grain yield of some lentil genotypes and relationship among univariate stability statistics. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(3), 385-394. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2008063-5292

De Souza, P. I., Egli, D. B., & Bruening, W. P. (1997). Water stress during seed filling and leaf senescence in soybean. Agronomy Journal, 89(5), 807-812. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900050015x

Dixit, P., & Dubey, D. K. (1985). Path analysis in lentil. Lens Newsletter, 11, 15-17.

Finlay, K., & Wilkinson, G. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(6), 742-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9630742

Forouzi, M., Ehteshami, S. M., Esfahani, M., & Rabiei, M. (2016). Study the amount of dry matter remobilization and current photosynthesis in different seed sizes of four wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars in Rasht. Iranian Journal of Seed Science and Research, 3(1), 47-61. (In Persian). https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.24763780.1395.3.1.4.8

Gauch, H., & Zobel, R. (1988). Predictive and postdictive success of statistical analyses of yield trials. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 76(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288824

Henderson, C. R. (1975). Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics, 31(2), 423-447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529430

Holland, J. B. (2006). Estimating genotypic correlations and their standard errors using multivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation with SAS Proc MIXED. Crop Science, 46(2), 642-654. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0191

Hossain, M. A., Sarker, U., Azam, M. G., Kobir, M. S., Roychowdhury, R., Ercisli, S., Ali, D., Oba, S., & Golokhvast, K. S. (2023). Integrating BLUP, AMMI, and GGE models to explore GE interactions for adaptability and stability of winter lentils (Lens culinaris Medik.). Plants, 12(11), 2079. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12112079

IBPGR, ICRISAT and ICARDA, (1993). Descriptors for Lentil International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India and International Center for Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria.

Jahufer, M. Z. Z., & Casler, M. D. (2015). Application of the Smith‐Hazel selection index for improving biomass yield and quality of switchgrass. Crop Science, 55(3), 1212-1222. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.08.0575

Joudi, M., & Ebadi, A. (2015). Evaluation of agronomic traits of Iranian wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars and their associations under terminal heat stress. Research in Field Crop Journal, 3(1), 42-54. (In Persian)

Karimizadeh, R., Pezeshkpour, P., Barzali, M., Mehraban, A., & Sharifi, P. (2020). Evaluation the mean performance and stability of lentil genotypes by combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(36), 160-170. (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jcb.12.36.160

Kumar, J., Kant, R., Kumar, S., Basu, P. S., Sarker, A., & Singh, N. P. (2016). Heat tolerance in lentil under field conditions. Legume Genomics and Genetics, 7(1), 1-11.

Laffont, J. L., Hanafi, M., & Wright, K. (2007). Numerical and graphical measures to facilitate the interpretation of GGE biplots. Crop Science, 47(3), 990-996. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.08.0549

Machado e Silva, C., Mezzomo, H. C., Ribeiro, J. P. O., Freitas, D. S., & Nardino, M. (2023). Multi-trait selection of wheat lines under drought-stress condition. Bragantia, Campinas, 82, e20220254.

Mohammadi, G. H., Golezani, K. G., Javanshir, A., & Moghaddam, M. (2006). The influence of water limitation on the yield of three lentil cultivars. JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology, 10(2), 109-120. (In Persian)

Nardino, M., Baretta, D., Carvalho, I. R., Olivoto, T., Follmann, D. N., Szareski, V. J., Ferrari, M., de Pelegrin, A. J., Konflanz, V. A., & de Souza, V. Q. (2016). Restricted maximum likelihood/best linear unbiased prediction (REML/BLUP) for analyzing the agronomic performance of corn. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(48), 4864-4872. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11691

Olivoto, T., Lúcio, A. D. C., da Silva, J. A. G., Marchioro, V. S., de Souza, V. Q., & Jost, E. (2019a). Mean performance and stability in multi-environment trials I: combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Agronomy Journal, 111(6), 2949-2960. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.03.0220

Olivoto, T., Lúcio, A. D. C., da Silva, J. A. G., Sari, B. G., & Diel, M. I. (2019b). Mean performance and stability in multi-environment trials II: Selection based on multiple traits. Agronomy Journal, 111(6), 2961-2969. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.03.0221

Olivoto, T., & Lúcio, A. D. (2020). Metan: An R package for multi-environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(6), 783-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13384

Olivoto, T., & Nardino, M. (2020). MGIDI: A novel multi-trait index for genotype selection in plant breeding. BioRxiv (Preprint), 2020:07. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.217778

Olivoto, T., & Nardino, M. (2021). MGIDI: Toward an effective multivariate selection in biological experiments. Bioinformatics, 37(10), 1383-1389. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa981

Oweis, T. Y., & Hachum, A. Y. (2003). Improving water productivity in the dry areas of West Asia and North Africa. In Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. pp. 179-198. Wallingford UK: CABI Publishing.

Parry, M. A., Andralojc, P. J., Khan, S., Lea, P. J., & Keys, A. J. (2002). Rubisco activity: Effects of drought stress. Annals of Botany, 89(7), 833-839. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf103

Pezeshkpour, P., Sharifi. P., Amiri, R., Namdari, A., Mirzaei, A., & Mehraban, A. (2025). Selection of stable lentil genotypes for rainfed conditions using multivariate methods. Legume Science, 7, e70047.  https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.70047

Pezeshkpour, P., Armion, M., & Rostami, B. (2024 a). Evaluation of the efficiency of WAASB, WAASBY indices and linear mixed effects model (LMM) for identifying high-yielding lentil genotypes adapted to rainfed regions. Crop Science Research in Arid Regions, 6(2), 431-452. (In Persian)

Pezeshkpour, P., Amiri, R., Karami, I., & Mirzaei, A. (2024 b). Evaluation of seed yield stability of lentil genotypes based on REML/BLUP and Multi-Trait Stability Index (MTSI). Journal of Crop Breeding, 16(2), 42-52. (In Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.61186/jcb.16.2.42

Pezeshkpour, P., Amiri, R., Karami, I., & Mirzaei, A. (2024 c). Genetic parameters, stability and selection of lentil genotypes under rainfed conditions for autumn planting using BLUP, WAASB and AMMI methods. Plant Production and Genetics, 5(2), 183-200. (In Persian).

Rahmati, M., Abdipour, M., & Sepahvand, M. (2024). Selection of durum wheat genotypes based on MGIDI and SIIG selection indexes. Plant Production and Genetics, 5(2), 299-312. (In Persian).

Resende, M. D. V. D. (2016). Software Selegen-REML/BLUP: A useful tool for plant breeding. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 16(04), 330-339.

Sehgal, A., Sita, K., Kumar, J., Kumar, S., Singh, S., Siddique, K. H., & Nayyar, H. (2017). Effects of drought, heat and their interaction on the growth, yield and photosynthetic function of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) genotypes varying in heat and drought sensitivity. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01776

Sellami, M. H., Pulvento, C., & Lavini, A. (2021). Selection of suitable genotypes of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) under rainfed conditions in south Italy using multi-trait stability index (MTSI). Agronomy, 11(9), 1807. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091807

Sharifi, P., Aminpanah, H., Erfani, R., Mohaddesi, A., & Abbasian, A. (2017). Evaluation of genotype× environment interaction in rice based on AMMI model in Iran. Rice Science, 24(3), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2017.02.001

Shirzad, A., Asghari, A., Zali, H., Sofalian, O., & Mohammaddoust Chamanabad, H. (2022). Application of the multi-trait genotype-ideotype distance index in the selection of top barley genotypes in the warm and dry region of Darab. Journal of Crop Breeding, 14(44), 65-76. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.52547/jcb.14.44.65

Shobeiri, S. S., Khorsandi, H., & Kamel, M. (2019). Effects of seed rates and row spaces on grain yield and yield components of two lentil cultivars under cold dryland conditions. Iranian Dryland Agronomy Journal, 7(2), 125-141. (In Persian).

Shobeiri, S. S., Pezeshkpour, P., & Naseri, B. (2024). Evaluation of efficiency of weighted average of stability and mean performance estimated by linear mixed models for identifying high‐yielding lentil genotypes adapted to rainfed regions. Legume Science, 6(2), e226. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.226

Smith, H. F. (1936). A discriminant function for plant selection. Annals of Eugenics, 7(3), 240-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02143.x

Smith, A. B., Cullis, B. R., & Thompson, R. (2005). The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: An overview of current mixed model approaches. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 143(6), 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005587

Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03

Verma, A., & Singh, G. P. (2021). Stability, adaptability analysis of wheat genotypes by AMMI with BLUP for restricted irrigated multi location trials in Peninsular zone of India. Agriculture Science, 12(3), 118-124. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2021.123013

Wright, K., & Laffont, J. L. (2018). Genotype plus genotype-by-environment biplots. R package. https://Kwstat.Github.io/gge/index.html.