The Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Yield and Its Related Traits in Promising Chiti Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes under Zanjan Province Climatic Condition

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Dryland Agricultural Research Institute, Zanjan Agricultural and Natural Recourses Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Zanjan, Iran

2 Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Zanjan Agricultural and Natural Recourses Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Given that successive droughts, particularly recent ones, have impacted most regions of Iran, drought stress is recognized as one of the major challenges for crop production in the country's arid and semi-arid regions. Beans grow in a wide range of areas that are subject to seasonal droughts and wide fluctuations in soil moisture in different years. Nevertheless, drought stress causes a significant decrease in bean seed yield, and the amount of yield decrease is different depending on the time, stress intensity and studied genotype. Due to environmental conditions in areas where bean cultivation is common, water deficit may occur more than once during the crop growth cycle. In addition, when a dry period (two to three weeks) occurs, especially during flowering, yield reduction will be significant. Drought-adapted cultivars in beans require less water for irrigation and thus help conserve water resources. Despite the desire of farmers to maximize the use of irrigation to increase production in dry and semi-arid conditions, even in the absence of water restrictions, excessive irrigation is not logical; therefore, in such a situation, the efficiency of water consumption in the farm should be optimized. Deficit irrigation is an optimization strategy that purposefully allows the plant to tolerate some degree of deficit irrigation and reduced yield. Several studies show that lack of irrigation causes a significant decrease in the number of seeds, seed weight, number of fertile pods, number of seeds in pod, seed yield, biological yield and harvest index. Of the two main components of seed yield (seed number and seed weight), seed number shows higher sensitivity to water deficit. In this regard, in this research, it has been tried to evaluate the effects of drought stress on yield and yield components in 16 genotypes and cultivars of chiti beans and determine the genotypes with optimal yield under water limitation conditions.
 
Materials and Methods
In order to investigate the effects of deficit irrigation on some phenological and yield traits of chiti beans, 14 promising chiti bean genotypes obtained from breeding programs along with Sadri and Kosha control cultivars, in two consecutive crop years from 2022 to 2023, at Kheirabad Zanjan Research Station, in two conditions normal irrigation (irrigation cycle of 5 days) and deficit irrigation (irrigation cycle of 9 days) were investigated. The experiment was performed at both conditions and in both years, as basic of complete randomized blocks design with 3 replications. Combined variance analysis and mean comparisons were performed and simple correlation coefficients between traits and stepwise regression analysis of traits affecting grain yield in both irrigation conditions were calculated.
 
Results and Discussion
Variance analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the 5 and 9 day irrigation cycles in the number of plants per plot and the number of pods per plant at the 1% level, and in the plant height and yield at the 5% level. There was significant difference between genotypes in terms of all the studied traits (except the number of plants in plot) at the probability level of 1%. Irrigation cycle of 9 days decreased plant height, seed yield and its components including number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and 100 seed weight. G8, G10, G14 and G15 genotypes had the highest and G13 and G2 genotypes had the lowest seed yield. Correlation analysis showed that in irrigation cycles of 5 and 9 days, there is the highest relationship between seed yield and the number of pods per plant. On the other hand, in the 5-day irrigation cycle, the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, and the 100 seed weight, and in the 9-day irrigation cycle, only the number of pods per plant were included in the regression model and had the greatest impact on seed yield.
 
Conclusions
The number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod and the 100 seed are considered the most important components affecting seed yield and by justifying the large amount of changes in seed yield, they can be used as important traits to improve bean yield in breeding programs in different conditions. Therefore, G8 genotype with the highest number of pods per plant and high weight of 100 seeds can be introduced as a favorable genotype for cultivation in dry conditions.

Keywords


©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Abebe, A., Brick, M. A., & Kirkby, R. (1998). Comparison of selection indices to identify productive dry bean lines under diverse environmental conditions. Field Crops Research, 58, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00082-3
Agricultural statistics for the year 2018-2019: crops (1): Information and Communication Technology Center of the Ministry of Agricultural Jihad
Amini, A. (1998). Investigating the genetic and geographical diversity of 576 bean cultivars of Karaj Faculty of Agriculture Gene Bank using multivariate statistical methods. M.Sc. Thesis in Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
Azizi, F., Rezaei, A., & Mirmohammadi Maybodi, S. A. M. (2001). Genetic and phenotypic variability and factor analysis for morphological traits in genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources-Water and Soil Science, 5, 127-141. (In Persian with English Abstract)
Bayat, A. A., Ahmadvand, G., & Dorri, H. (2010a). The effect of water stress on the yield and yield components of spotted beans genotypes. Journal of Agronomical Sciences of Iran, 45, 42-45. (In Persian with English Abstract)
Bayat, A. A. Sepehri, A., Ahmadvand, G., & Dorri, H. R. (2010b). Effect of water deficit stress on yield and yield components of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 12(1), 42-54. (In Persian with English Abstract). http://dx.doi.org/20.1001.1.15625540.1389.12.1.4.1
Behboudian, M. H., Turner Ma, Q. N. C., & Palta, J. A. (2001). Reactions of chickpea to water stress: Yield and seed composition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 81, 1288-1291. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.939
Becker, H. C. & Leon, J. (1988). Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding, 101, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x
Bonanno, A. R. & Mack, H. J. (1983). Yield components and pod quality of snap bean grown under differential irrigation. Journal of American Society Horticultural Science, 108, 837-844. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.108.5.832
Boutraa, T., & Sanders, F. E. (2001). Influence of water stress on grain yield and vegetative growth of two cultivars of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 187(4), 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037x.2001.00525.x
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003). Understanding plant responses to drought from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology, 30(3), 239-264. https://doi.org/10.1071/fp02076
Dewey, D. R., & Lu, K. H. (1959). A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agronomy Journal, 51, 515-518. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100090002x
Dorri, H. R., Ghanbari, A. A., Lak, M. R., & Bani Jamali, M. (2017). Guide to beans. First volume. Publication of Agricultural Education, Karaj, Iran. 124 p.
Dwyer, L. M., Tollenar, M., & Stwart, D. W. (1991). Changes in plant density dependence of leaf photosynthesis of maize (Zea mays) hybrids. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 71, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps91-001
Ebadi, M., Majnoon Hosseini, N., & Chai Chi, M. (2016). Effect of root fungus and humic compounds on yield and yield components of single cross 704 maize under low irrigation conditions. Journal of Crop Science, 47(2), 174-165. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJFCS.2016.58851
Emam, Y., & Nycnejad, M. (2004). Introduction on Plant Physiology. Shiraz University Press, Shiraz, Iran. 571 p.
English, M., & Raja, S. N. (1996). Review perspective on deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 32, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(96)01255-3
Faraji, H., Gholizadeh, S., Owliaiee, H. R., & Azimi Gandomani, M. (2010). Effect of plant density on grain yield of three spotted bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars in Yasouj condition. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 1(1), 43-50. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/IJPR.V1I1.6338
Faramarzi, A., Jamshidi, S., & Salehi, M. (2008). Study of drought stress at different growth stages on yield and yield components of three chitti bean cultivars. Abstracts of 10th Iranian Crop Production and Plant Breeding. Karaj, Iran. p. 465. (In Persian)
Frahm, M. A., Rosas, J. C., Mayek-Pérez, N., López-Salinas, E., Acosta-Gallegos, J. A., & Kelly, J. D. (2004). Breeding beans for resistance to terminal drought in the lowland tropics. Euphytica, 136(2), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:euph.0000030671.03694.bb
Ghasemi Golezani, K., Movvahedi, M., Rahimzadeh Khoei, F., & Moghaddam, M. (1997). Effect of water deficit on growth and yield of two pea cultivars in different densities. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 7(3-4), 17-42. (In Persian with English Abstract)
Ghorbanli, M., Gafarabad, M., Amirkian, T., & Mamaghani, B. A. (2013). Investigation on proline, total protein, chlorophyll ascorbate and dehydroascorbate changes under drought stress in Akria and Mobil tomato cultivars. Iran Journal of Plant Physiology, 3, 651-658. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.30495/IJPP.2013.540675
Gebeyehu, S. (2006). Physiological response to drought stress of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes differing in drought resistance. Cuvillier Verlag, Gottingen, Germany. http://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-16880
German, C., & Teran, H. (2006). Selection for drought resistance in dry bean landraces and cultivars. Crop Science, 46, 2111-2120. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0029
Habibi, G., Ghanadha, M., Soohani, A., & Dorri, H. R. (2006). Study of seed yield with some important agronomic traits relationships in red common bean by different methods statistics at limited irrigation condition. Agricultural Science, 13(3), 1-13. (In Persian with English Abstract)
Hasheme-jazi, S. M., & Danesh, A. (2004). Effect of row spacing and plant distances in row on grain yield and yield component in pinto bean cv. Talash. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science, 2, 154-162. (In Persian with English Abstract)
Hu, Y. Y., Zhang, Y. L., Yi, X. P., Zhan, D. X., Luo, H. H., Chow, W. S., & Zhang, W. F. (2013). The relative contribution of non-foliar organs of cotton to yield and related physiological characteristics under water deficit. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(5), 975-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60568-7
Kalamian, S., Modarres Sonavy, S. A. M., & Sepehri, A. (2005). Effect of water deficit stress on reproductive and vegetative growth in commercial and leafy hybrids of corn. Agricultural Research, Water, Soil and Plant in Agriculture, 5, 38-53.
Karimzadeh, H., Nezami, A., Kafi, M., & Tadayon, M. (2017). Effects of deficit irrigation on yield and yield components of pinto bean genotypes in Shahrekord. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 8(1), 113-126. https://doi: 10.22067/ijpr.v8i1.49118
Khoshvaghti, H., Ghasemi-Golozani, K., Zehtab-Salmasi, S., & Alyari, H. (2008). Effect of limited water on growth, cover canopy and seed yield of chitti bean cultivars. Paper Abstracts of 10th Iranian Crop Production and Plant Breeding. Karaj, Iran. p. 464-465. (In Persian)
Koocheki, A., & Banayane Avval, M. (1994). The physiology of crop yield. Jahad Daneshgahi Mashhad Press, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian)
Kumar, J., Singh, H., Singh, T., Tonk, D. S., & lal, R. (2002). Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield and its components in summer moong (Vigna radiate L. Wilczek). Crop Research, 24, 374-377.
Lesznyak, M., Hunyadi Borbely, E., & Csajbok, J. (2008). The role of nutrient-water-supply and the cultivation in the yield of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Cereal Research Communications, 36, 1079-1082. https://doi.org/10.1556/crc.35.2007.2.141
Liebman, M., Corson, A., Rowe R. J., & Halteman, W. A. (1995). Dry bean response to nitrogen fertilizer in two tillage and residue management system. Agronomy Journal, 87, 538-546. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700030024x
Mendham, N. J., & Salisbury, P. A. (1995). Physiology. Crop development. Growth and yield In: D. Kimbers & D. I. Mc Greagor (Eds). CAB international, 11-67.
Mohammadi, A., Bihamta, M. R., & Dorri, H. (2017). Determination of phenotypic correlation coefficients and causality analysis of some traits of broad bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under non-stress and drought stress conditions. Journal of Agriculture, Water, Soil and Plant Research, 8(2), 135-144. (In Persian with English Abstract)
Mohammadi, G., Javanshir, A., Khooie, F., Mohamadi, R., & Zehtab Salmasi, S. (2005). Critical period of weed interference in chickpea. Weed Research, 45(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2004.00431.x
Moutonnet, P. (2002). Yield response factors of field crops to deficit irrigation. FAO Irrigation and Drainage; pp. 22. Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/Y3655E/Y3655E00.HTM
Nasirzadeh, L., Majnoon-Hossaini, N., & Ahmadi, A. (2008). Effect of water stress and nitrogen fertilizer on yield in D81083 common bean cultivar. Paper Abstracts of 10th Iranian Crop Production and Plant Breeding. Karaj, Iran. p. 469. (In Persian)
Pessarakli, M. (2001). Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology. Second Edition, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, p. 997. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003093640
Rahimi Chegeni, A., Bihamta, M. R., & Khodarahmi, M. (2017). Evaluation of different characteristics of wheat genotypes under drought stress using multivariate statistical. Journal of Crop Breading, 9, 147-155. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.29252/jcb.9.21.147
Ramirez-Vallejo, P., & Kelly, J. D. (1998). Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica, 99, 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018353200015
Rosales-Serna, R., Kohashi-Shibata, J., Acosta-Gallegos, J. A., Trejo-Lo'pez, C., Soritz-Cereceres, J. & Kelly, J. D. (2004). Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in drought-stresses common bean cultivars. Field Crops Research, 85, 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00161-8
Rosales-Serna, R., Kohashi-Shibata, J., Acosta-Gallegos, J. A., Trejo-López, C., Ortiz-Cereceres, J., & Kelly, J. D. (2002). Yield and phenological adjustment in four drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative, 45, 198-199.
Safapour, M., Khagani, S., Amirabadi, M., Teymouri, M., & Bazyan, M. K. (2009). Statistical analysis of the effect of water stress on phenological and agronomical traits of white bean genotypes. The New Agricultural Findings, 4, 367-378. (In Persian with English Abstract)
Salehi, F. (2015). Principles of breeding and cultivation of common bean. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Education Publication. 265 p.
Samper, C., & Adams, M. W. (1985). Geometric mean of stress and control yield as a selection criterion for drought tolerance. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative, 28, 53-54.
Singh, S. H. (2007). Drought resistance in the race Durango dry bean landraces and cultivars. Agronomy Journal, 99, 1919-1225. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0301
Singh, D. P., Singh, P., Sharma, H. C., & Turner, N. C. (1987). Influence of water deficit on the water relations, canopy gas exchange and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Research, 16, 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(87)90062-1
Stephens, D. B. (1994). A perspective on diffuse natural recharge mechanism in areas of low precipitation. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 58, 40-48. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800010006x
Sylspur, M., Jaafari, P., & Mollahosseiny, H. (2006). Effect of drought stress and plant density on yield and some agronomy traits of corn (Zea mays). Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.52016
Teran, H., & Singh, S. P. (2002). Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought on resistance in common bean. Crop Science, 42, 46-51. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.6400
Vafabakhsh, J., Nassiri Mahallati, M., & Koocheki, A. (2012). Effect of drought stress on yield and radiation use efficiency of rape seed (Brassica napus L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Research, 6(1), 193-204. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/GSC.V6I1.1191
Vlizadeh, M., & Moghadam, M. (2010). Experimental Designs in Agriculture. Fourth Ed. Privar Publishers, Iran.
Wakrim, R., Wahbi, S., Tahi, H., Aganchich, B., & Serraj, R. (2005). Comparative effects of partial root drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) on water relations and water use efficiency in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 106(2-3), 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.10.019
CAPTCHA Image
  • Receive Date: 22 January 2024
  • Revise Date: 02 April 2024
  • Accept Date: 04 April 2024
  • First Publish Date: 12 November 2024