Changes in CAT gene expression of and catalase enzyme activity under drought stress in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) cultivars

Document Type : مقالات پژوهشی

Authors

• Manijeh Rahimi ¹
• Mehrana Koohi-Dehkordi ¹
• Abdolrazagh Danesh Shahraki ²

¹ Payame Noor University

² Shahrekord University

10.22067/ijpr.v11i1.73034

Abstract

Introduction
Lentil is one of the oldest sources of human food. Since around 25% of the daily protein requirement of the developing world's peoples comes from legumes, considering to significant percentage of protein (about 23%) and high amino acids content of alpha-hydroxy- ornitin, alpha-hydroxy-arginine and hemoarginine in addition to ordinary amino acids in lentils, this plant commonly known as good protein supplements. Drought stress as one of the most important non-biological stresses causes an average of 50% reduction in crop yield in the world. In Iran is also faces a shortage of water in many areas due to climate characteristics and more than half of the country's land are in arid and semi-arid areas. Research on lentil has shown that this plant is more sensitive to drought during advanced stages of growth than the early stages, and it seems that the adaptation of this period to the end of the season is the main cause of its reduced yield. Therefore, achieving genotypes that are able to resist drought condition can significantly prevent crop yields. It has been observed that, under drought stress conditions, the activity of antioxidant enzymes in tolerant plants is much higher compare to sensitive plants. It seems antioxidant enzymes have an important role in tolerance to drought stress. Therefore, in this study, the effects of drought stress on catalase enzyme activity and CAT gene expression pattern in three lentil cultivars (Kimia, Gachsaran and L7) in both stages of vegetative and reproductive were studied.
 
Materials & Methods
The experiment was performed in a completely randomized design with three replications for three levels of drought stress (without drought stress, stress in the vegetative stage and stress in the reproductive stage) and analyzed in factorial experiment. Young leaf tissues were used for RNA extraction, samples were transferred to ribonuclease free microtubules and stored at 80°C. The total RNA extraction was performed using the Denazist Total RNA isolation kit. To eliminate the possible contamination of the genomic DNA from extracted RNA samples, the samples were treated with DNaseI enzyme. An agarose gel electrophoresis was used to confirm the quality and quantity of RNA samples. Synthesis of the first strand of cDNA was performed using DNA synthesis kits, RB MMLV Reverse Transcriptase, manufactured by RNA Biotechnology Company. Two specific primers CAT (Catalase) and ACT (Actin) (internal control gene) were used to analyses the gene expression. In this reaction, the RB SYBR qPCR kit containing SYBR® Green I Dye was used manufactured by RNA Biotechnology Company. The reaction was carried out using Thermocycler Applied Biosystem, Model Step One 48 well by Comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) method and according to the methodology presented by the manufacturer. The threshold cycle (Ct) for each sample was determined by the device, then the data were analyzed by relative quantitative method by Pfaffl et al. (2002). The activity of catalase enzyme was measured by Aebi (1984) method. Analysis of Real Time PCR data was performed using Excel and LinRegPCR softwares. The SAS software was used to analyze the variance of the data. Comparison of the averages was performed using the least significant difference (LSD) method at the 5% probability level.
 
Results & Discussion
Based on the obtained result, there was no significant difference between the cultivars of lentil in control treatment (no drought stress) for catalase activity. By applying drought stress, the activity of catalase enzyme increased in all three cultivars. The highest activity of catalase was observed in L7 (Twice as much as the control) and Kimia and Gachsaran cultivars were significantly different from the L7 cultivar. Significant differences were observed between the cultivars in CAT gene expression. The L7 cultivar with 1.7 showed the highest gene expression and Kimia and Gachsaran cultivars had the lowest CAT gene expression with 0.95 and 0.94, respectively. Gene expression level at reproductive stage was increased to 0.39 in compared to vegetative stage. Drought stress increased the CAT gene expression significantly (about 1.6 times of control). In both vegetative and reproductive stages, L7 cultivar had the highest gene expression with rate of 1.39 and 2.2, respectively. Investigating the interaction of drought stress with cultivar showed that there was no significant difference between Gachsaran and Kimia cultivars in control and stress conditions in terms of gene expression level, while in both control and stress conditions, L7 cultivar showed the significant difference.
 
Conclusion
Based on the results of this study, in all three lentil cultivars, the gene expression pattern showed high correlation with physiological results. Due to the fact that expression of CAT gene in other cultivars causes drought resistance, it is expected that more resistance will be observed in the cultivars by increasing the expression during drought stress. Under stress conditions, L7 cultivar showed higher catalase activity in both vegetative and reproduction stages than the other two cultivars. Therefore, it seems that L7 cultivar is more tolerant to drought stress than Kimia and Gachsaran cultivars.

Keywords

• Drought stress
• Gene expression
• Lentil
• Catalase
• cat
• qRT-PCR

---

References

1. Aebi, H. 1984. Catalase in Vitro. Methods in Enzymology 105: 121-126.

2. Ahmadi, J., and Soleimani, V. 2015. The Expression profile of OSBP, CAT and BZIP genes in drought tolerant and susceptible soybean cultivars using real time PCR. Agricultural Biotechnology 6(3):1-16 (In Persian with English Summary).

3. Allahmoradi, P. 2011. The Reaction of antioxidants of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) cultivars in response to drought stress. MSc. Thesis. Razi University, Iran (In Persian).

4. De Carvalho, M.H.C., and Contour-Ansel, D. 2008. (h)GR, beans and drought stress. Plant Signaling & Behavior 3(10): 834-835.

5. De, R., and Kar, R.K. 1995. Seed germination and seedling growth of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under water stress induced by PEG-6000. Seed Science Technology 23: 301-308.

6. Farshi, A., Siadat, H., Darbandi, S., Ansari, M., Kheirabi, J., Mirlatifi, M., Salamat, A., and Sadat-Miri, M.H. 2003. Irrigation Water Management on the Farm. First Edition. Iranian National Irrigation and Drainage Committee Publishers. p. 187. (In Persian).

7. Ganjeali, A., and Nezami, A. 2008. Ecophysiology and Limiting the Yield of Beans. Mashhad University Jihad Publishers. p. 500. (In Persian).

8. Guo, Z., Ou, W., Lu, S., and Zhong, Q. 2006. Differential responses of antioxidative system to chilling and drought in four rice cultivars differing in sensitivity. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 44: 828-836.

9. Habibi, D., Boojar, M.M., Mahmoudi, A., Ardakani, M.R., and Taleghani, D. 2004. Antioxidative Enzymes in sunflower subjected to drought stress. In 4th International Crop Science Congress, September 2010, Australia. p.1-4.

10. Heidari, M., and Karami, V. 2014. Effects of different mycorrhiza species on grain yield, nutrient uptake and oil content of sunflower under water stress. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 13: 9-13.

11. Hieng, B., Ugrinovic, K., Sustar-Vozlic, J., and Kidric, M. 2004. Different classes of proteases are involved in the response to drought of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivars differing in sensitivity. Journal of Plant Physiology 161(5): 519-530.

12. Lascano, H.R., Antonicelli, G.E., Luna, C.M., Melchiorre, M.N., Gomez, L.D., Racca, R.W., Trippi, V.S., and Casano, L.M. 2005. Antioxidant system response of different wheat cultivars under drought: field and in vitro studies. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28: 1095-1102.

13. Liu, X., and Huang, B. 2000. Heat stress injuey in relation to membrane lipid peroxidation in creeping bentgrass. Crop Science 40: 503-510.

14. Maksimović, J.J.D., and Živanović, B.D. 2012. Quantification of the antioxidant activity in salt-stressed tissues. In: Plant Salt Tolerance Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. p. 237-250.

15. Manivannan, P., Jaleel, C.A., Kishorekumar, A., Sankar, B., Somasundaram, R., Sridharan, R., and Panneerselvam, R. 2007. Changes in antioxidant metabolism of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. by propiconazole under water deficit stress. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 57(1): 69-74.

16. Mazandarani, A., Rahim-Malek, M., Navvabpur, S., and Ramazanpur, S.S. 2012. Catalase gene expression under drought stress at flowering stage in soybean cultivars. 3rd Iranian Agricultural Biotechnology Congress. September 3-5, 2012. Ferdowsi University Mashhad, Iran. p. 312. (In Persian).

17. Ministry of Agricultural Jahad. 2016. Agricultural Products Statistics. p. 117. (In Persian).

18. Mishra, B.K., Srivastava, J.P., and Lal, J.P. 2014. Drought stress resistance in two diverse genotypes of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) imposed at different phenophases. Journal of Food Legumes 27(4): 307- 314.

19. Mishra, B.K., Srivastava, J.P., Lal, J.P., and Sheshshayee, M.S. 2016. Physiological and biochemical adaptations in lentil genotypes under drought stress. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 63(5): 695- 708.

20. Moloudi, F., Navabpour, S., Soltanloo, H., Ramazanpour, S.S., and Sadeghipour, H. 2013. Catalase and Metallothionein genes expression analysis in wheat cultivars under drought stress condition. Journal of Plant Molecular Breeding 1(2): 54-68. (In Persian with English Summary).

21. Mostafaei, A. 2005. Theoretical and Practical Electrophoresis of Protein in the Gel. Yadavaran Publishers. p. 184. (In Persian).

22. Perl-Treves, R., and Perl, A. 2002. Oxidative stress: an introduction. Oxidative Stress in Plants p. 1-32.

23. Pfaffl, M.W., Horgan, G.W., and Dempfle, L. 2002. Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 30(9): 36-36.

24. Sabaghpoar, S.H. 2006. Parameters and Mechanisms if Drought Tolerance in Crops. Natonal Committee of Agriculture Aridity and Drought Management 145 p.

25. Sairam, R.K., and Srivastava, G.C. 2001. Water stress tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): variations in hydrogen peroxide accumulation and antioxidant activity in tolerant and susceptible genotypes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 186(1): 63-70.

26. Sharma, S.K, and Chahota, R. 2004. Current status of interspecific hybridization in geneus lens. Journal of Lentil Research 1: 15-18.

27. Shrestha, R., Turner, N.C., Siddique, K.H.M., Turner, D.W., and Speijers, J. 2006a. A water deficit during pod development in lentils reduces flower and pod numbers but not seed size. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 57: 427-438.

28. Soltani, A. 2006. Revision of the Application of Statistical Methods in Agricultural Research. Mashhad University Jihad Publications. p. 74. (In Persian).

29. Sulser, H., and Sager, F. 1976. Identification of uncommon amino acids in the lentil seed (Lens culinaris Med.). Experientia 32(4): 422-423.

30. Tichopad, A., Didier, A., and Pfaffl, M.W. 2004. Inhibition of real-time RT-PCR quantification due to tissue specific contaminants. Molecular and Cellular Probes 18: 45-50.

31. Torres-Franklin, M.L., Contour-Ansel, D., Zuily-Fodil, Y., and Pham-Thi, A. T. 2008. Molecular cloning of glutathione reductase cDNAs and analysis of GR gene expression in cowpea and common bean leaves during recovery from moderate drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 165(5): 514-521.