Response of faba bean and pea yield and yield components to cereal-legume intercropping under weed competitions

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

• leila Soleimanpur ¹
• Ruhollah Naderi ¹
• Ehsan Bijanzadeh ¹
• Yahya Emam ²

¹ Shiraz University

² Reading

10.22067/ijpr.v8i1.51248

Abstract

Introduction
Cereal-legume intercropping is one of the best ways to increase the yield per unit area (to decrease the detrimental effect caused by weeds and to reduce application of fertilizers and herbicides. Stoltz et al. (2014) in a study on corn-pea intercropping reported that crops yield in intercropped plots was significantly greater than that of monoculture. It has been reported that barley-faba bean intercropping led to an increase in total grain yield and it could cause a decrease in weed biomass. Considering the importance of intercropping to reach stability and sustainability in production, the aim of this study was to assess the changes in yield and yield components of faba bean and pea in intercropping with wheat, barley and triticale under weedy conditions in southern Fars Province.

Materials & Methods
A field experiment was performed in the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Darab, Shiraz University during 2014-2015. Treatments included 10 monoculture (wheat, barley, triticale, pea and faba bean with and without weeds) and 6 intercropping (wheat + pea, wheat + faba bean, barley + pea, barley + faba bean, triticale + pea and triticale + faba bean with weeds) which laid out based on a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Irrigation intervals were 8 and 12 days based on environmental conditions. Weeds were hand weeded twice, at tillering and booting stages of cereals. After crop maturity, plants were hand harvested to measure yield and yield components. Additionally, partial land equivalent ratio (LER) was calculated. The partial land equivalent ratio has been defined as a measure of efficiency of an intercrop or mixture. The LER compares land areas required under single or sole cropping to give the yields obtained from the component crops of the mixture. Values greater than 0.5 indicate intercropping to be more efficient than sole cropping in terms of land use, while values less than 0.5 indicate a loss in efficiency due to intercropping. Values equal to 0.5 indicate that the components fully share the same limiting resource. The data analyzed by using MSTATC ver2.10 software (1991). Since the number of the plants was not similar in all the plots, the data was subjected to analysis of covariance.

Results & Discussion
Results showed a significant effect of treatments on 1000-seed weight of pea, number of pod per m2, number of seed per pod, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index and LER. The greatest 1000-seed weight of pea, number of pod per m2, seed yield and harvest index obtained in intercropping of wheat + pea (366.7 g), weed-free pea monoculture (1317), weed-free faba bean monoculture (4149 kg/ha) and weed-free faba bean monoculture (46.46 %), respectively. The highest number of seed per pod was obtained in intercropping of barley + faba bean (3.7), weed-free faba bean monoculture (3.29) and intercropping of wheat + faba bean (2.93), respectively. Total and partial LER of legumes in all intercropping treatments compared to weedy monoculture was greater than 1 and 0.5, respectively. The results showed that weed-free monoculture treatments had the highest grain yield, biological yield and harvest index. However, crop yield and harvest index in intercropping treatments were similar or superior to weedy monocultures. For instance, grain yield and harvest index in intercropping of wheat + faba bean was higher than those of in weedy faba bean monoculture, 102 and 93 %, respectively. In general, grain yield, biological yield and harvest index of pea and faba bean in weed-free monocultures treatments was higher than weedy monocultures and intercropping treatments. Grain yield and harvest index of intercropping was similar or higher than those of weedy monocultures.

Conclusion
Total and partial LER of legumes in all intercropping treatments compared to weedy monoculture was greater than 1 and 0.5, respectively. Since cereals are more competitive than legumes, it seems for increasing the efficiency of intercropping; a higher density of legumes should be used. Additionally, for reducing weed interference and increasing yield in pea and faba bean, the use of cereal-legume intercropping is recommended.

Keywords

• barley
• LER
• Sustainable agriculture
• Triticale
• wheat

---

References

1. Abdulahi, A., Nasrolahzadeh, S ., Dabbagh Mohammadi, A., Zehtab Salmasi, S., and Pourdad, S.S. 2013. Study on effect of weed interference and nitrogen fertilizer on performance of chickpea in intercropping with wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 23(4): 85-100. (In Persian with English Summary).

2. Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A., and Sinebo, W. 2006. Yield performance and land use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. European Journal of Agronomy 25: 202-207.

3. Alizadeh, Y., Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2009. Yield, yield components and potential weed control of intercropping bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) with sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 7(2): 553-541. (In Persian with English Summary).

4. Barker, S., and Dennett, M.D. 2013. Effect of density, cultivar and irrigation on spring sown monocrops and intercrops of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and faba beans (Vicia faba L.). European Journal of Agronomy 51: 108-116.

5. Bedoussac, L., and Justes, E. 2011. A comparison of commonly used indices for evaluating species interactions and intercrop efficiency: Application to durum wheat–winter pea intercrops. Field Crops Research 124: 25-36.

6. Chapagain, T., and Riseman, A. 2014. Barley–pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformations. Field Crops Research 166: 18-25.

7. Ghamari, H., and Ahmadvand, G. 2013. The effect of different interference periods and weed control on height, yield and yield components of red bean. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 3(9): 71-79. (In Persian).

8. Gholinezhad, E., and Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E. 2014. Evaluation of grain yield and quality of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) in intercropping with chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 16(3): 236-249. (In Persian with English Summary).

9. Hamzei, J., and Seyedi, M. 2013. Evaluation of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) intercropping systems using advantageous indices of intercropping under weed interference conditions. Journal of Agronomy Sciences 6(9): 1-21. (In Persian with English Summary).

10. Husseini, S.A., Rashed Mohassel, M.H., Nassiri Mahallati, M., and Hajmohammadnia Ghalibaf, K. 2009. The influence of nitrogen and weed interference periods on corn (Zea mays L.) yield and yield components. Journal of Plant Protection 23(1): 97-105.

11. Jensen, E.S., Peoples, M.B., and Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. 2010. Faba bean in cropping systems. Field Crops Research 115: 203-216.

12. Lithourgidis, A.S., Vlachostergios, D.N., Dordas, C.A., and Damalas, C.A. 2011. Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea-cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy 34: 287-29.

13. Mazaheri, D. Madani, A., and Oveysi, M. 2006. Assessing the land equivalent ratio (LER) of two corn (Zea mays L.) varieties intercropping at various nitrogen levels in Karaj, Iran. Journal of Central European Agriculture 7(2): 359-364.

14. Mei, P.P., Gui, L.G., Wang, P., Hung, J.C., Long, H.Y., Christie, P., and Li, L. 2012. Maize/Faba bean intercropping with rhizobia inoculation enhances productivity and recovery of fertilizer P in a reclaimed desert soil. Field Crops Research 130: 19-27.

15. Nasrollah-zadeh, S., Ghassemi-Golezani, K., and Raey, Y. 2011. Effects of shading on rate and duration of grain filling and yield of faba bean cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 21(3): 75-87. (In Persian with English Summary).

16. Neugschwandtner, R., and Kaul, H.P. 2014. Sowing ratio and N fertilization affect yield and yield components of oat and pea in intercrops. Field Crops Research 155: 159-163.

17. Pelzer, E., Bazot, M., Makowski, D., Corre-Hellou, G., Naudin, C., Al Rifaï, M., Baranger, E., Bedoussac, L., Biarnès, V., Boucheny, P., Carrouee, B., Dorvillez, D., Foissy, D., Gaillard, B., Guichard, L., Mansard, M.C., Omon, B., Prieur, L., Yvergniaux, M., Justes, E., and Jeuffroy, M.H. 2012. Pea–wheat intercrops in low-input conditions combine high economic performances and low environmental impacts. European Journal of Agronomy 40: 39-53.

18. Podgorska-Lesiak, M., and Sobkowicz, P. 2013. Prevention of pea lodging by intercropping barley with peas at different nitrogen fertilization levels. Field Crops Research 149: 95-104.

19. Poggio, S.L. 2005. Structure of weed communities occurring in monoculture and intercropping of field pea and barley. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 109: 48-58.

20. Seyedi, M., Hamzei, J., Ahmadvand, G., and Abutalebian, M.A. 2012. The evaluation of weed suppression and crop production in barley-chickpea intercrops. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 22(3): 101-114. (In Persian with English Summary).

21. Stoltz, E., and Nadeau, E. 2014. Effects of intercropping on yield, weed incidence, forage quality and soil residual N in organically grown forage maize (Zea mays L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Field Crops Research 169: 21-29.

22. Tosti, G., and Guiducci, M. 2010. Durum wheat-faba bean temporary intercropping: Effects on nitrogen supply and wheat quality. European Journal of Agronomy 33: 157-165.