The Critical period of weed competition in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) under Kermanshah condition

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

• shayesteh taherabadi ¹
• mokhtar Ghobadi ²
• Pezhman Allahmoradi ²

¹ Razi University, Kermanshah

² Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

10.22067/ijpr.v7i2.27152

Abstract

Introduction
Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) is an important legume in the Mediterranean area. High protein content in lentil seed (about 22-28%) makes it as a good food source for developing countries and low-income people. In the west of Iran such as Kermanhah province, it is the most important pulse in rainfed systems cultivated traditionally in rotation with wheat and barley. Lentil is grown either as a spring or a winter crop. The cold tolerant cultivars of lentil can be sown in the fall and have by to over 50% more than spring-sown cultivars. Weed interference and moisture restriction are known as the most important factors affecting lentil yield. The average yield loss caused by weeds has reported about 84% in lentil. Since lentil is categorized as a slow-rate growth crop especially during early stages, it is affected by weeds depressingly. The critical period for weed control is defined as a period in which weeds must be controlled to prevent un-acceptable yield loss of crop. Knowledge of the critical period is useful in making decisions on the need for and timing of weed control and in achieving efficiently herbicide use from both biological and economical perspectives. In practical view, the critical period is defined as a number of weeks after emerging crop during which a crop must be free from weeds in order to prevent yield loss greater than 5%. This study aimed to determine the critical period of weed competition in lentil under the growing conditions of the Kermanshah province.

Materials and Methods
This experiment was done at Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran, during 2009-2010 growing season. The experiment was conducted as factorial arrangement based on randomized complete block design with three replications. Experimental factors were two lentil cultivars (Gachsaran and Local) and treatments of critical period of weed control. For the second factor, there were two sets of treatments. In the plots of first treatments, weeds were allowed to grow for 15, 30, 45, and 60 days after crop emergence, after which the plots kept fully free of weeds by harvest time. In the plots of second treatments, weeds were kept fully free of weeds for 15, 30, 45, and 60 days after crop emergence and then weeds were allowed to grow until harvest time. For both of them, there were full season-long weed-infested and weed-free plots as control treatments. Weeds were cut from the soil surface and sorted by species, counted, and finally dried to measure above-ground dry matter. After physiological ripening of lentil, the crop was harvested and biomass, grain yield, 1000 grain weight, the number of pods per plant, the number of grains per plant and plant height were measured.


Results and Discussion
Analysis of variance showed that grain yield, biological yield, pod weight in plant, grain weight in plant and plant height effected significantly by the weed interference period, while it not influenced significantly on 1000 seed weight. Increasing in weed-free period caused reduction in weed dry matter and weed density whereas by prolonging the interference period, weed dry matter increased and weed density showed an upward trend until 45 days after emergence and had a sharp fall after that. The maximum weed interference period (beginning of critical period) based upon 5 and 10% level of grain yield loss for Gachsaran cultivar were 17 and 21 days after emergence, while for Local was 15 and 20 days after emergence, respectively. The minimum period of weed control (the end of critical period) based upon 5 and 10% level of grain yield loss were 63 and 56 days after emergence for Gachsaran cultivar, and 62 and 54 days after emergence for Local, respectively.

Conclusion
According to this research, under Kermanshah climatic conditions, the critical period of weed control based upon 5% level of grain yield loss for Gachsaran and Local lentil cultivars were obtained 46 and 47 days after emergence, respectively, and based upon 10% level of yield loss, critical period of weed control were 35 and 34 days after emergence, respectively. There was no significant difference between Gachsaran and Local lentil cultivars in terms of critical period of weed control.

Key words: Lentil, Weed density, Weed dry matter, Yield loss

Keywords

• Lentil
• Weed density
• Weed dry matter
• Yield loss

---

References

1. Aghaali Khani, M., and Yaghoobi, S.R. 2008. Critical period of weed control in winter canola (Brassica napus L.) in a semi- Arid Region. Pakestan luenci of Biological Sciences 11(5): 773-777.

2. Ahmadi, A., Rashed Mohassel, M.H., Baghestani Meibodi, M.A., and Rostami, M. 2004. The effect of critical period of weed competition on yield, yield components, and morphological characteristics of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivar. Derakhshan (In Persian). Pest and Plant Diseases 72 (1): 31-49.

3. Asghari, J., and Cheraghi, Gh. 2003. The critical period of weed control in two late and medium maturity grain maize (Zea mays) cultivars. Journal of Iranian Agronomical Sciences 5(4): 285-301. (In Persian).

4. Buhler, D.D. 2002. Challenges and opportunities for integrated weed management. Weed Science 50: 273-280.

5. Chikowo, R., Faloya, V., Petit, S., and Munier-Jolain, N.M. 2009. Intergrated weed management systems allow reduced reliance on herbicides and long-term weed control. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 132(3-4): 237- 242.

6. Eftekhari, A., Shariani Rad, A.H., Rezai, A.M., Salehian, H., and Ardakani, M.R. 2005. Determining of critical period of weeds control in Soybean (Glycine max L.) in Sari region. Journal of Iranian Agronomical Sciences 7(4): 347-364. (In Persian with English Summary).

7. Erman, M., Tepe, L., and Bukun, B. 2008. Critical period of weed control in winter Lentil under non-irrigated conditions in Turkey. African Journal of AgriculturaL Research 3(8): 523-530.

8. Evans, S.P., Knezevic, S.Z., Lindquist, J.L., Shapiro, C.A., and Blankenship, E.E. 2003. Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Science 51(3): 408-417.

9. Hall, M.R., Swanton, C.J., and Anderson, G.W. 1992. The critical period of weed competition in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Science 40: 44-447.

10. Hosseini, F.S., Nezami, A., Parsa, M., and Hajmohammadnia Ghalibaf, K. 2011. Effects of supplementary irrigation on yield and yield components of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) cultivars in Mashhad climate. Journal of Water and Soil 25(3): 625-633. (In Persian with English Summary).

11. Johnson, D.E., Wopereis, M.C.S., Mbodj, D., Diallo, S., and Haefele, S.M. 2004. Timing of weed management and yield losses due to weeds in irrigated rice in the Sahel. Field Crop Research 85: 31-42.

12. Kavurmaci, Z., Karadavut, U., Kokten, K., and Bakoglu, A. 2010. Determining critical period of weed-crop competition in faba bean (Vicia faba). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12(2): 318-320.

13. Knezevic, S.Z., Evans, S.P., Blankenship, E.E., Van Acker R.C., and Lindquist, J.L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analyses. Weed Science 50:773-786.

14. Lak, M.R., Dari, H.R., Ramazani, M.K., and Hadizadeh, M.H. 2005. Investigation of critical period of weed control in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 9(3): 161-168. (In Persian).

15. Mahmoodi, S., and Rahimi, A. 2009. The critical period of weed in corn in Birjand region, Iran. International Journal of Plant Production. 3(2): 91- 96.

16. Martin, M., and Williams, M. 2006. Planting date in critical period of weed control in sweet corn. Weed Science 54: 928-933.

17. Memar Zahedani, M., Asghari, J., Amini, I., babaian Jelodar, N.A., and Barzegar Khu, M.H. 2007. Critical period of weeds in Tobacco (Niconiana tabacum L.) in Gilan Province climate. Journal of Iranian Agricultural Sciences 38(1): 277-285. (In Persian).

18. Mohammadi, G., Javanshir, A., and Khooei, F.R. 2004. Period of weed interference in chickpea. Weed Research 45: 57-63.

19. Mousavi, S.K., and Ahmadi, A. 2009. Weed population and interference response to sowing date and lentil (Lens culinaris Med.) cultivar in dryland condition of Khorramabad Electronic. Journal of Crop Production 2(2): 111-128. (In Persian with English Summary).

20. Norsworthy, J.K., and Oliveira, M.J. 2004. Comparison of the critical period for weed control in wide- and narrow- row corn. Weed Science 52: 802- 807.

21. Radosevich, S.R., Holt, J.S., and Ghersa, C. 2005. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

22. Rezvani, H., Latifi, N., and Zeinali, E. 2009. Determination of critical period for velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) control in summer seeded Soybean, Williams cultivar. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 1(2): 45-65. (In Persian with English Summary).

23. Saeidi, Z., and Salehi, F. 2005. Study on resistance to two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) of selected lines from Lordegan chitti bean variety. Pests and Plant Diseases 73(1): 65-77. (In Persian).

24. Seyedi, S.M., Ghorbani, R., Rezvani Moghadam, P., and Nasiri Mahalati, M. 2011. Investigation of critical period of weed control in Nigella (Nigella sativa) In Mashhad. Journal of Iranian Crop Sciences 42(4): 809-819. (In Persian).

25. Seyedi, S.M., Rezvani Moghadam, P., Ghorbani, R., and Nasiri Mahalati, M. 2012. Effect of critical period of weed competition on yield and yield components and oil yield of Nigella (Nigella sativa). 26(1): 113-122. (In Persian).

26. Swanton, C.J., and Weise, S.F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technology 5: 657-663.