The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application and Planting Pattern on Yield and Competition Indices of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Elham Raftari
• Ali Nakhzari Moghaddam
• Mehdi Mollashahi
• Ebrahim Gholamalipour Alamdari

Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Gonbad Kavous, Gonbad Kavous, Iran

10.22067/ijpr.2024.86819.1083

Abstract

Introduction
Intercropping, the agricultural practice of cultivating two or more crops in the same space at the same time, is an old and commonly used cropping practice which aims to match efficiently crop demands to the available growth resources. The practice of growing two or more crops simultaneously in the same field is called intercropping and it is a common feature in traditional farming of small landholders. It provides farmers with a variety of returns from land and labour, often increases the efficiency with which scarce resources are used and reduces the failure risk of a single crop that is susceptible to environmental and economic fluctuation. Intercropping of chickpea with linseed reduced the chickpea yield by 60.3%, although linseed occupied only 33% of the total area. The loss of chickpea yield was compensated by the additional yield of linseed, and thus the system productivity of chickpea + linseed intercropping was increased by 43.4% compared with sole chickpea. Of this increase in system productivity, 65.3 and 34.7% were contributed by higher seed yield and higher minimum prices of linseed, respectively as compared to chickpea. The objectives of the present study were to study the competition indices of chickpea and quinoa intercropping such as land equivalent ratio, relative crowding coefficient, aggressivity, chickpea equivalent yield and effects of nitrogen and different intercropping arrangements on yield of sole chickpea, sole quinoa and intercropping yield of two plants. The objectives of the present study was to determine the best appropriate treatment of sole cropped, replacement and additive series of chickpea and quinoa in terms of yield and investigation of competition indices in intercropping replacement and additive chickpea and quinoa.
 
Materials and Methods
In order to study the effect of planting pattern and nitrogen application on yield and competitive indicators of chickpea and quinoa, a factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) was conducted with three replications at Gonbad Kavous University farm during the 2020-2021 growing season. Nitrogen factor was included three levels of non-application and application of 25 and 50 kg N.ha^-1 and the treatments of intercropping were included 9 levels of sole cropped of chickpea and quinoa, 67% chickpea + 33% quinoa, 50% chickpea + 50% quinoa, 33% chickpea + 67% quinoa, 100% chickpea + 33% quinoa, 100% chickpea + 50% quinoa, 100% chickpea + 67% quinoa and 100% chickpea + 100% quinoa. For analysis variance of data software of SAS Ver. 9.4 was used and treatment mean differences were separated by the least significant difference (LSD) test at the 0.05 probability level.
 
Results and Discussion
Results showed that the effects of planting pattern and nitrogen consumption on yield were significant at confidence level of 1%. The maximum total yield belonged to the treatment sole cropped of chickpea with 3529 kg.ha^-1, which was not significantly different from the 67% chickpea + 33% quinoa treatment. With increase of nitrogen fertilizer consumption, total yield was increased. The lowest chickpea crop equivalent yield related to the treatment sole cropped of chickpea and mixed crop was 33% increase of quinoa to chickpea crop with 3529 and 3551 kg.ha^-1, respectively, and the highest was related to sole cropped of quinoa with 8876 kg.ha^-1. Land equivalent ratio was higher than one in all the additive mixed cropping treatments and alternative mixed cropping treatments. The maximum proportion of land belonging to the treatment of 100% chickpeas + 67% quinoa was 1.10. The relative coefficient of total density in all treatments was more than one, which indicates the desirability of mixed cultivation of chickpea and quinoa. The examination of the aggressivity index showed that quinoa was dominant in the mixed cropping treatments, increasing and replacing the plant. As a result, the dominance index of quinoa was positive despite the favorable yield of both plants.
 
Conclusions
Of the two plants of chickpea and quinoa, quinoa plant produced more yield than chickpea plant. The maximum total yield belonged to the treatment sole cropped of chickpea with 3529 kg.ha^-1, which was not significantly different from the 67% chickpea + 33% quinoa treatment. With increasing of nitrogen fertilizer consumption, yield was increased. According to the results, it seems that it is not possible to increase the density of two plants in mixed cultivation to obtain the maximum yield.

Keywords

• Aggressivity
• Intercropping
• Land equivalent ratio
• Chickpea equivalent yield

---

©2024 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

References

Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A., & Sinebo, W. (2006). Yield performance and land-use efficiency of barley and faba bean mixed cropping in Ethiopian highlands. European Journal of Agronomy, 25(3), 202-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.05.002

Atis, I., Kotgen, K., Hatipoglu, R., Yilmaz, S., Atak, M., & Can, E. (2012). Plant density and mixture ratio effects the competition between vetch and wheat. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6(3), 498-505.

Awal, M. A., Pramanik, M. H. R., & Hossen, M. A. (2007). Interspecies competition growth and yield in barley peanut intercropping. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 6(4), 577-584. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2007.577.584

Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B. K., & Ghosh, S. S. (2006). Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: Advantages and weeds mothering. European Journal of Agronomy, 24, 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.10.010

Baser Kouchebagh, S., Mirshekari, B., & farahvash, F. (2012). Improvement of corn yield by seed biofertilization and urea application. World Applied Sciences Journal, 16(9), 1239-1242.

Bedoussac, L., & Justes, E. (2010). Dynamic analysis of competition and complementarity for light and N use to understand the yield and the protein content of a durum wheat–winter pea intercrop. Plant and Soil, 330, 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0303-8

Choi, W. J., Han, G. H., Lee, S. M., Lee, G. T., Yoon, K. S., Choi, S. M., & Ro, H. M. (2007). Impact of land-use types on nitrate concentration and N¹⁵ in unconfined groundwater in rural areas of Korea. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 120(2-4), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.10.002

Dhima, K. V., Lithourgidis, A. S., Vasilakoglou, I. B., & Dordas, C. A. (2007). Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research, 100(2-3),: 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.008

Fallah, S. A. (2011). Recovery of nitrogen residue by the canola (Brassica napus) in rotation forage maize – canola. Journal of Agroecology, 1(2), 83–75. (In Persian with English Abstract)

Fallah, S. A., Baharlouie, S., & Abbasi Suraki, A. (2014). Evaluation of competitive and economic indices in canola and pea intercropping at different rates of nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Agroecology, 6(3), 571-581. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V6I3.23941

Gao, Y., Duan, A., Sun, J., Li, F., Liu, H., & Liu, Zh. (2009). Crop coefficient and water-use efficiency of winter wheat/spring maize strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 111(1-2), 65-73.

Ghosh, P. K. (2004). Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Research, 88, 227-237.

Hosseini, S. M. B., Mazaheri, D., Jahansouz, M. R., & Yazdi Samadi, B. (2003). The effects of nitrogen levels on yield and yield components of forage millet (Pennisetum americanum) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in intercropping system. Journal of Pajouhesh Va Sazandegi, 16(2), 60-67. (In Persian with English Abstract)

Lamei Heravani, J. (2012). Technical and economical evaluation of mixed cropping Lathyrus with barley and triticale under dryland conditions in Zanjan province. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 2(4): 93-103.

Lamei Heravani, J. (2013). Assessment of dry forage and crude protein yields, competition and advantage indices in mixed cropping of annual forage legume crops with barley in rainfed conditions of Zanjan. Seed and Plant Production Journal 29(2):169-184. (In Persian with English Abstract)

Lithourgidis, A. S., Vlachostergios, D. N., Dordasc, C. A., & Damalas, C. A. (2011). Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea–cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy 34(4): 287-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.02.007

Morgado, L., & Willey, R. W. (2003). Effects of plant population and nitrogen fertillizer on yield and efficiency of maize-bean intercropping. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 38(11): 1257-1264.

Najafi, S., & Keshtehgar, A. (2014). Effect of intercropping on increase yield. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 8(5): 549-552.

Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., Dehghanpour Inchehbron, O., &  Rahemi Karizaki, A. (2016). The effects of nitrogen levels and intercropping pattern on forage yield and competition indices of barley and pea. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 9(1): 199-214. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22069/EJCP.2016.2964

Raftari, E., Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., Mollashahi, M., & Hosseini Moghaddam, H. (2018). The effect of nitrogen fertilizer and planting pattern on yield and competition indices of pea (Pisum sativum L.) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Journal of Agroecology. 10(2): 504-515. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V10I2.61305

Rastgoo, S., Aynehband, A., & Fateh, E. (2015). Competitiveness of sesame and mung bean crops in both monocropping and intercropping systems. Journal of Agroecology 7(3): 356-367. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/110.22067/JAG.V7I3.31213

Willey, R. M. (1979). Intercropping, its importance and research needs, competition and yield advantages. Journal of Crop Science 32: 1-10.

Yilmaz, S., Atak, M., & Erayman, M. (2008). Identification of advantages of maize legume intercropping over solitary cropping through competition incides in the east Mediterranean region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 32: 111-119.