Investigation of photosynthetic and yield traits and the relationship between them in lentil genotypes under rainfed conditions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Crop and Horticultural Science Research Department, Zanjan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center (AREOO), Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

Inroduction
Considering the development of cultivation and production of legumes and the importance of genetic studies in plant breeding, identifying the genetic potential of these plants is very important. Knowledge of genetic diversity and relationships between genotypes is important for understanding available genetic variability and the potential to use it in breeding programs. According to previous studies on lentils, it was found that improving the yield potential per unit area can be one of the important criteria for increasing the production of this plant. Increasing the yield per unit area is possible mainly by modifying and creating high-yielding cultivars, improving the characteristics and increasing the quantitative and qualitative potentials. Breeders and plant physiologists believe that in order to be more productive in improving compatible cultivars in areas with limited water resources, recognizing the agronomic traits affecting grain yield under stress conditions will be of great importance; Therefore, indirect selection based on physiological traits has been proposed as a complement to the selection of cultivars with high yield potential. Considering the different reactions of photosynthetic indices under stress conditions, it is important to know the genotypic diversity of photosynthetic indices under culture conditions and their relationship with grain yield. Despite numerous studies on the role of physiological traits in drought tolerance in crops, recent studies on lentils, especially in Iran, are limited. This study was designed and carried out with the aim of determining genotypes with desirable physiological and yield traits and the relationship between these traits and photosynthesis under rainfed conditions.
 
Materials & Methods
In order to study the photosynthetic and yield parameters of lentil plant in rainfed conditions, selected advanced lentil lines with control cultivars were studied in a randomized complete block design with 3 replications in Khodabandeh dryland research station in Zanjan Province in two cropping seasons 2018 to 2020. Physiological traits included photosynthesis per unit leaf area, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, photosynthetic activated radiation, sub stumatal CO2, leaf temperature, photosynthetic water use efficiency, mesophilic conductivity and water use efficiency. Plant height, 100-seed weight, number of pods and yield (kg/ha) were also measured for each genotype in each plot. Analysis of variance and comparison of means were performed using Duncan's test at 5% probability level. Finally, correlation analysis and stepwise regression analysis were performed with the variables of photosynthesis rate and total yield.
 
Results & Discussion
The results showed that there was a significant difference in photosynthetic active radiation, leaf temperature, photosynthetic water use efficiency, mesophilic conductivity, water use efficiency, 100-grain weight and yield between two years of experiment. The studied genotypes showed significant differences in leaf temperature, photosynthesis, plant height, 100-seed weight and yield, which indicated the high genetic diversity of these genotypes in terms of these traits. The interaction effect of genotype per year was not significant in all studied traits, which shows that the trend of changes in these traits between genotypes during the two years was the same. Among the studied genotypes, G5 genotype is a genotype with superior agronomic characteristics that can be recommended as a cultivar with high yield potential. Photosynthesis rate showed a significant negative correlation with leaf temperature and significant positive correlation with transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, mesophilic conductivity, water use efficiency and 100-grain weight. 100-seed weight showed a significant negative correlation with leaf temperature and a significant positive correlation with stomatal conductance, photosynthesis, mesophilic conductivity and water use efficiency. These results show that drought and lack of water in the soil have the greatest effect on reducing photosynthesis and plant yield at different phenological stages (seedling, flowering and podding) of the plant. Finally, regression analysis showed that stomatal conductance and sub stumatal CO2 explained the changes in photosynthesis.
 
Conclusion
The results showed that for lentils, two traits of stomatal conductance and sub stumatal CO2 concentration may explain the changes in photosynthesis. Genetic diversity is very important for crop breeding and higher diversity of genotypes provides a better chance of producing a variety of desirable cultivars. The observed genetic diversity in traits can help select superior genotypes based on phenotypic expression and can be used in breeding programs to improve economically important traits. Finally, among the studied genotypes, G5 genotype was found to be a genotype with superior agronomic characteristics that could be recommended to the farmers to improve lentil yield.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ahmadpour, R., and Hosseinzadeh, S.R. 2017. Change in growth and photosynthetic parameters of Lentil (Lens culinaris ) in response to methanol foliar application and drought stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciences 6(1): 7-12. (In Persian with English abstract).
  2. Ahmadpour, R., Hosseinzadeh, S.R., and Armand, N. 2016a. Evaluation of methanol role in reducing the negative effects of water deficit stress in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Iranian Journal of Plant Process and Function 5: 1-13. (In Persian with English abstract).
  3. Ahmadpour, A., Hosseinzadeh S.R., and Chashiani, S. 2016b. Study of root morpho-physiological and biochemical characteristics of lentil (Lens culinaris) in response to moisture stress. Journal of Plant environmntal Physiology 11(43): 39-51. (In Persian with English abstract).
  4. Ahmadi, A., and Siosemardeh, A. 2005. Investigation on physiological basis of grain yield and drought resistance in wheat: leaf photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and nonstomatal Limitations. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 7(5): 807-811. (In Persian with English abstract).
  5. Amiri, H., Ismaili, A., and Hosseinzadeh, S.R. 2015. Influence of vermicompost fertilizer and water deficit stress on morpho-physiological features of chickpea (Cicer arietinum cv. karaj). Compost Science and Utilization 25(3): 152-165.
  6. Anyia, A.O., and Herzog, H. 2004. Water use efficiency, leaf area and leaf gas exchange of cowpeas under mid-season drought. European Journal of Agronomy 20: 327-339.
  7. Araus, J.L., Casadesus, J., and Bort, J. 2001. Recent tools for the screening of physiological traits determining yield. In: M.P. Reynolds, L. Ortiz- Monasterio and A. McNab (Eds.). Application of physiology in wheat breeding. Mexico. D.F.CIMMYT, 59-77.
  8. Austin, R.B. 1989. Genetic variation in photosynthesis. Journal of Agricultural Science 112: 287-293.
  9. Bahadoran, M., Abrishamchi, P., Ejtehadi, H., and Ghassemzadeh, F. 2015. Study on some physiological characteristics of Salsola richteri in drought condition in the two desert regions of the South Khorasan province. Iranian Journal of Plant Biology 7(24): 1-14.
  10. Bender Ozenç, D. 2008. Growth and transpiration of tomato seedlings grown in Hazelnut Husk compost under waterdeficit stress. Compost Science and Utilization 16: 125-13.
  11. Bishop, D.L., and Bugbee, B.G. 1998. Photosynthetic capacity and dry mass partitioning in dwarf and semi-dwarf wheat. Journal of Plant Physiology 153: 558-565.
  12. Brownlee, C. 2001. The long and short of stomatal density signals. Trends in Plant Science 6: 441-442.
  13. Fakheri, B.A., and Mohammadpour Vashvaei, R. 2016. Genetic variation and factor analysis of morphological and phonological traits for macrosperma and microsperma lentils lines. 94: 15-29. (In Persian with English abstract).
  14. Fikiru, E., Tesfaye, K., and Bekele, 2010. A comparative study of morphological and molecular diversity in Ethiopian lentil (Lens culinaris) landraces. African Journal of Plant Science 4(7): 242-254.
  15. Fikru, M., Mekbib, F., Kumar, S., Ahmed, S., and Sharma, T.R. 2014. Phenotypic variability and characteristics of Lentil (Lens culinaris) germplasm of Ethiopia by multivariate analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research 2(6): 104-116.
  16. Flexas, J., and Medrano, H. 2008. Droughtinhibition of photosynthesis in C3-plants: Stomatal and non-stomatal limitation revisited. Annual of Botany 183: 183-189.
  17. Ganjeali, A., Parsa, H., and Bagheri, A. 2011. Assessment of Iranian chickpea (Cicer arietinum ) germplasms for drought tolerance. Agriculture Water Management 98: 1477-1484. (In Persian with English abstract).
  18. Ghahghaei, M., Galavi, M., Ramroodi, M., and Bagheri, A. 2010. The comparison of yield and yield components of Lentil genotypes at low irrigation in Sistan region. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Research 8(3): 431-437. (In Persian with English abstract).
  19. Guerfel, M., Baccouri, O., Boujnah, D., Cha, W., and Zarrouk, M. 2008. Impacts of water stress on gas exchange, water elations, chlorophyll content and leaf structure in the two main Tunisian olive (Olea europaea ) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 1: 1-7.
  20. Hamdi, A., Erskine, W., and Gates, P. 1992. Adaptation of lentil seed yield to varying moisture supply. Crop Science 32: 987-990.
  21. Hosseinzadeh, S.R., Amiri, H., and Ismaili, A. 2016. Effect of vermicompost fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum ) under drought stress. Photosynthetica 54(1): 87-92.
  22. Hosseinzadeh, S.R., Salimi, A., Ganjeali, A., and Ahmadpour, R. 2014. Effects of foliar application of methanol on photosynthetic characteristics chlorophyll fluorescence and chlorophyll content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum ) under drought stress. Iranian Journal of Plant Biology 5: 115-132. (In Persian with English abstract).
  23. Jackson, P., Robertson, M., Cooper, M., and Hammer, G. 1996. The role of physiological understanding in plant breeding; from a breeding perspective. Field Crops Research 49: 11-39.
  24. Jaleel, C.A., Gopi, R., and Panneerselvam, R. 2008. Growth and photosynthetic pigments responses of two varieties of Catharanthus roseus to triadimefon treatment. Comptes Rendus Biology 331: 272-277.
  25. Johnson, J.D., Tognetti, T., and Paris, P. 2002. Water relations and gas exchange in poplar and willow under water stress and elevated atmospheric CO2. Physiology Plantarum 115: 93-100.
  26. Kafi, M., Nezami, A., Hosaini, H., and Masomi, A. 2005. Physiological effects of drought stress by polyethylene glycol on germination of lentil (Lens culinaris) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 3: 69-80. (In Persian with English abstract).
  27. Karimi, S., Yadollahi, A., and Arzani, K. 2015. Gas-exchange response of almond genotypes to water stress. Photosynthetica 53: 29-34.
  28. Kruger, G.H.J., Van Rensburg, L., and Mahtis, P. 1995. Carbon dioxide fixation: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations in drought stressed Nicotina tobacum cultivar. Xth International Photosynthesis Congress, Montpellier, France 5: 505-510.
  29. Nasr Esfahani, M., and Madadkar Haghjou, M. 2015. Response of Glycine max to drought stress in relation to growth parameters and some key enzymes of carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Iranian Journal of Plant Biology 7(24): 77-89. (In Persian with English abstract).
  30. Nouri Goghari, M., Dashti, H., Madah Hosseini S., and Dehghan, E. 2015. Evaluation of genetic diversity of Lentil germplasm using morphological traits in Bardsir. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 45(4): 541-551. (In Persian with English abstract).
  31. Pagter, M., Bragato, C., and Brix, H. 2005. Tolerance and physiological responses of Phragmites australis to water deficit. Aquatic Botany 81: 285-299.
  32. Parsa, M., and Bagheri, A. 2008. Legumes. Publications Jahad University of Mashhad.
  33. Pezeshkpour, P., and Afkar, S. 2019. Assessment of variability of lentil genotypes for agronomic traits using multivariate analyses. Journal of Crop Breeding 11(30): 142-151. (In Persian with English abstract).
  34. Piper, F.I., Corcuera, L.J., Alberdi, M., and Lusk, C. 2007. Differential photosynthetic and survival responses to soil drought in two evergreen nothofagus species. Annals of Forest Science 64: 447-452.
  35. Rahbarian, R., Khavari-Nejad, R., Ganjeali, A., Bagheri, A.R., and Najafi, F. 2011. Drought stress effects on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and water relations in tolerant and susceptible chickpea (Cicer arietinum ) genotypes. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia-Series Botanica 53: 47-56.
  36. Reddy, A.R., Chaitanya, K.V., and Vivekanandan, M. 2004. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 161: 1189-
  37. Richards, R.A., Condon, A.G., and Rebetzke, G.J. 2001. Traits to improve yield in dry environments. In: M.P. Reynolds, U. Ortiz-Monasterio and A. Mcnab (Eds.). Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding Mexico, CIMMYT.
  38. Salehi, M., Haghnazari, A., Shekari F., and Baleseni, H. 2007. Evaluation of relationship between different traits in Lentils (Lens culinaris). Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 11(41): 205-216. (In Persian with English abstract).
  39. Saman, S.M., Mozafari, J., Vaezi, S., Abbasi Moghaddam, A., and Mostafaie, H. 2012. Genetic diversity of pod and seed characteristics in lentil germplasm of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 14(2):171-182. (In Persian with English abstract).
  40. Singh, B.D. 2000. Plant Breeding: Principles and Methods, Kalyani Publishers. 896pp.
  41. Singh, K.B., and Saxena, M.C., 1993. Breeding for Stress Tolerance in Cool-Season Food L The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff/Junk.
  42. Singh, G., Sekhon, H.S., and Kolar, J.S. 2005. Pulses. Agrotech Publishing Academy, Udaipur, India.
  43. Yazdi Samadi, B., Majnoun Hosseini, N., and Peighambari, S.A. 2004. Evaluation of cold hardiness in Lentil genotypes (Lens culinaris). Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 20(1): 23-37. (In Persian with English abstract).
  44. Yordanov, I., Velikova, V., and Tsonev, T. 2003. Plant responses to drought and stress tolerance. Bulgharestan Journal of Plant Physiology 2: 187-206.
  45. Zahedi, F., Nabati, D., Mohammadi, M., and Karimzadeh, R.A. 2016. Path analysis to study Morpho-physiological traits, yield and traits related to yield of Lentil genotypes under rainfed condition. Journal of Plant Production 39(2): 71-80. (In Persian with English abstract).
  46. Zlatev, Z.S., and Yordanov, I.T. 2004. Effects of soil drought on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in bean plants. Bulgharestan Journal of Plant Physiology 30: 3-18.
  47. Zou, G.H., Liu, H.Y., Mei, H.W., Liu, G.L., Yu, X.Q., Li, M.S., Wu, J.H., Chen, L., and Luo, L.J. 2007. Screening for drought resistance of rice recombinant inbred populations in the field. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 49: 1508-1516.
CAPTCHA Image
Volume 13, Issue 2 - Serial Number 26
December 2022
Pages 91-103
  • Receive Date: 21 September 2021
  • Revise Date: 20 August 2022
  • Accept Date: 27 August 2022
  • First Publish Date: 22 December 2022