Response of yield and yield compounds of rain-fed chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.) to plant density and weed interference

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

• Arsalan Fallahi ¹
• Goudarz Ahmadvand ¹
• Farzad Mondani ²
• Akbar Aliverdi ¹

¹ Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

² Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agricultural Science and Engineering, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Razi University of Kermanshah, Kermanshah, Iran

10.22067/ijpr.v12i1.74983

Abstract

Introduction
The most important principle in the rain-fed cropping system is to maintain and optimal use of soil moisture. In this regard, selecting the appropriate cultivar and planting density is one of the most important management decisions. The open canopy structure, short stature, limited leaf area, and the slow growth rate of chickpea is responsible for its poor competitive ability against weeds. In rain-fed cropping systems, weeds can also play an important role in soil moisture depletion and can aggravate drought stress on crop at the end of the growing season. Among the weed control cropping methods, it is possible to select a competitive cultivar and/or increased planting density. After introducing a new cultivar from rain-fed chickpea, researchers have always compared it with older cultivars in terms of competitive ability against weeds. So far, there has been no comparative study of competitive ability or tolerance of a new rain-fed chickpea cultivar, Adel, against weeds with older cultivars. Consequently, the effect of planting density of this new rain-fed chickpea cultivar on the response of weeds was not investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the interaction of this new and old cultivars and planting density on weeds damage under rain-fed conditions in Kermanshah.
 
Materials and Methods
This research was carried out at the research farm of the faculty of agriculture and natural resources of Razi University, Kermanshah, during 2013-2014 growing season. Wheat was planted in the same farm during the previous growing season. During the experiment, the total rainfall was 85.51 mm. After preparing the land to plots of 6 × 2 m², the chickpea cultivars were manually planted with the distance of 40 cm on each row on 5 February 2013. The experiment was a factorial (3 crop densities × 4 chickpea cultivars × 2 weed interferences) in a completely randomized block design with three replications. Planting densities were 31.3, 38.5, and 50.0 plants m^-2. Chickpea cultivars were Arman (FLIP90-96C), Azad (FLIP93-93C), Adel (FLIP99-66C), and Hashem (FLIP84-48C). The factor of weed interference was at two levels of weeding and unweeding. The crop was harvested on 28 June 2014 to evaluate yield and yield components. The samplings of weeds were performed to determine the total biomass using a 1 m² quadrate on 20 May and 12 June 2014, which were coincident with the flowering time and physiological maturity of chickpea, respectively.
 
 
Results and Discussion
In general, the economic yield was decreased by increasing the plant density in all chickpea cultivars. The planting densities of 38.5 and 50.0 plants m^-2 reduced the economic yield up to 8.9 and 42.6% in Azad cultivar, 30.5 and 37.2% in Arman cultivar, 23.7 and 40.2% in Hashem cultivar and 32.9 and 36.3% in Adel cultivar compared to planting densities of 31.3 plants m^-2, respectively. Azad cultivar produced the highest economic yield (146.4 g m^-2) under weeded condition, while the lowest economic yield (45.2 g m^-2) belonged to Arman cultivar under un-weeded condition. The presence of weeds resulted in a reduction of 59.1, 51.9, 61.2, and 46.3%, in the economic yield of Azad, Arman, Hashem, and Adel cultivars, respectively. During the first weeds sampling, the highest (25.7 g m^-2) and the lowest (17.7 g m^-2) weed biomass were observed at planting density of 31.3 and 38.5 plants m^-2, respectively- whereas during the second weeds sampling, the highest (60.0 g.m^-2) and the lowest (42.8 g. m^-2) weed biomass were observed at 31.3 and 50.0 plants m^-2, respectively. Moreover, during the second sampling of weeds, the highest (54.7 g m^-2) and the lowest (40.8 g m^-2) weed biomass were observed at the plots of Hashem and Adel cultivars, respectively.
 
Conclusion
In this research, the planting density of 31.3 plants m^-2 was optimal planting density for all four chickpea cultivars. It seems that the increase of planting density to control weeds in rain-fed chickpea cropping system is an unsuitable technique. Therefore, it is necessary to consider other techniques to control weeds in rain-fed chickpea cropping systems. An interesting observation in this study was that, although the economic yield of Adel cultivar was lower, the lower biomass of weeds in the plots of this cultivar was observed compared to other cultivars. This observation can be related to allelopathic compounds produced by Adel cultivar which is costly for the crop itself and has reduced its yield.

Keywords

• Allelopathy
• Competition
• Rain-fed cropping system

Main Subjects

• Agronomy

---

References

1. Akbari, A., Zand, E., and Mousavi, S.K. Evaluation the effect of row space and weed management approaches on biomass, chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) yield, and yield components in Khorramabad dryland condition. Electronic Journal of Crop Production 3(3): 1-21. (In Persian with English Summary).
2. Ahmadi, A., Bazgir, E., and Mousavi, S.K. 2008. Sowing date and crop density effects on weed interference in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Lorestan province. Proceeding of the 2^nd National Weed Science Congress. January 29-30, 2008. Volume 1: Mashhad Agricultural Jahad Organization; p: 15-18. (In Persian with English Summary).
3. Ahmadi, K., Gholizadeh, H., Ebadzadeh, H.R., Hosseinpour, R., Abdoshah, H., Kazemiyan, A., and Rafiei, H. 2017. Agricultural Statistics for 94-95 Crop Y Ministry of Agriculture (In Persian).
4. Allahdadi, I.,  Shirkhani, A., and Rahimian Mashhadi, H. 2006. Effect of weeds in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) yield. Agriculture 8(2): 1-12. (In Persian with English Summary).
5. Fallah, S. 2008. Effects of planting date and density on yield and its components in chickpea (Cicerarietinum) genotypes under dryland conditions of Khorram-Abad. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 12(45): 123-135. (In Persian with English Summary).
6. Fallah, S., Ehsanzadeh, P., and Daneshvar, M. 2005. Grain yield and yield components in three chickpea genotypes under dryland conditions with and without supplementary irrigation at different plant densities in Khorram-Abad, Lorestan. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 36(3): 719-731. (In Persian with English Summary).
7. Gholami Zali, A., Ehsanzadeh, P., and Razmjoo, J. 2015. Effects of irrigation regimes on seed yield and yield components of chickpea cultivars at two autumn and spring planting seasons in Lorestan province. Journal of Field Crop Sciences 46(1): 123-135. (In Persian with English Summary).
8. Jahanghiri, A.,  Sadeghzadeh-Ahari, D.,  Safikhani, M.,  Pezeshkpour, P.,  Saeid, A.,  Sarparast, R.,  Sabaghpour, S.H., Karimizadeh, R.,  Shahriari, D.,  Bahrami, N.,  Shabani, A.,  Mahmoudi, A.A.,  Mahmoudi, F.,  Armyion, M.,  Kanouni, H.,  Mahdiyeh, M.,  Dehnavi, B., Etezadi, F., and Mohammadi, M.S. 2015. Adel, a new rainfed chickpea cultivar for autumn planting under moderate cold and semi-warm regions of Iran. Research Achievements for Field and Horticulture Crops 4(1): 1-13. (In Persian with English Summary).
9. Jalilian, J., Modarres Sanavy, S.A.M., and Sabaphpour, S.H. 2005. Effect of plant density and supplemental irrigation on yield, yield components and protein content of four chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) cultivars under dry land condition. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 12(5): 1-9. (In Persian with English Summary).
10. Karimi Torki, B., Hasanian Khoshrou, H., Bi-Hamta, M.R., Moradi, P., and Alipour Yamch, M.H. 2011. Evaluation of tolerance of chickpea genotypes to weed c Seed and Plant Production Journal 4(2): 471-478. (In Persian with English Summary).
11. Khajehpour, M.R. 2014. Principles and Fundamentals of Crop P 3^rd Edition. Jahad Daneshgahi Isfahan University of Technology. (In Persian).
12. Liu, P.H., Gan, Y., Warkentin, T., and McDinald, C. 2003. Morphological plasticity of chickpea in a semiarid environment. Crop Science 43(1): 426-429.
13. Majnoon Hosseini, N., Mohammadi, H., Poustini, K., and Zeinaly Khanghah, H. 2003. Effect of plant density on agronomic characteristics, chlorophyll content and stem remobilization percentage in chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum). Iranian Journal Agricultural Sciences 34(4): 1011-1019. (In Persian with English Summary).
14. Miller, P.R., McConkey, B.G., Clayton, G.W., Brandt, S.A., Staricka, J.A., Johnston, A.M., Lafond, G.P., Schatz, B.G., Baltensperger, D.D., and Neill, K.E. 2002. Pulse crop adaptation in the northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 94(6): 261-272.
15. Mohammaddoust Chamanabad, H.R. 2010. Weed Control. Jihad-e- Daneshgahi press. 236 pp. (In Persian).
16. Mohammaddoust Chamanabad,R., and Bakhshi M. 2016. Study of effective morpho-physiological characteristics on wheat competitive ability against weeds. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science 26(1):57-66. (In Persian with English Summary).
17. Mohammadi, Gh.R., Javanshir, A., Rahimzadeh-Khoie, F., Mohammadi, A., and Zehtab-Salmasi, S. 2004. The effect of weed interference on shoot and root growth and harvest index in chickpea. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 6(3): 181-191. (In Persian with English Summary).
18. Moosavi, S.K.,  Pezeshkpoor, P.,  and Shahverdi, M. 2010. Effects of planting date, crop variety, and weed interference on yield and yield components of dryland chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 40(4): 59-69. (In Persian with English Summary).
19. Mousavi, S.K., and Ahmadi, A. 2009. Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) yield and yield components to sowing date, crop density and weed interference in Lorestan province. Journal of Plant Protection 23(2): 1-13. (In Persian with English Summary).
20. Naroui Rad, M.R., Ghasemi, A., and Arjmandinejad, A. R. 2010. Study of limited irrigation on yield of lentil genotypes of national Plant Gene Bank of Iran by drought resistance indices. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 7(2): 238-241.
21. Naseri, R., Siyadat, S.A., Soleymani Fard, A., Soleymani, R., and Khosh Khabar, H. 2011. Effects of planting date and density on yield, yield components and protein content of three chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) cultivars under rainfed conditions in Ilam province. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 2(2): 7-18. (In Persian with English Summary).
22. Nasr Esfahani, M., and Mostajeran, A. 2014. Evaluation of symbiotic effects of different strains of Mesorhizobium cicer on drought stress tolerance of chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum). Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi) 103(3): 123-131. (In Persian with English Summary).
23. Nemati,, Asghari, A., Sofalian, O., Rasoulzadeh, A., and Mohammaddoust, H.R. 2012. Effect of water stress on rapeseed cultivars using morpho-physiological traits and their relations with ISSR markers. Journal of Plant Physiology Breeding 2(1): 55-66. (In Persian with English Summary).
24. Nourbakhsh, F., Ghobadi, M.K., Ghobadi, M., and Saeedi, M. 2013. Effect of plant density on chickpea and different weed control methods on yield, chickpea and weed yield components. MS Thesis. Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary).
25. Parsa, M., Aliverdi, A., and Hammami, H. 2014. Activity of the recommended and optimized rates of pyridate on chickpea-Mesorhizobium mediterraneum Notulae Scientia Biologicae 6(1): 92-98.
26. Sadidi, A., and Armin, M. 2015. The effect of competition period on yield and yield components of chickpea in conventional and dormant sowing conditions. Journal of Crop Production Research 7(3): 223-237. (In Persian with English Summary).
27. Seyed Sharifi, R., Mohammadi Khanghah, P., and Raey, Y. 2014. Effect of plant density on yield, yield components and some physiological indices of chickpea cultivars three. Crop PhysiologyJournal 5(20): 25- (In Persian with English Summary).
28. Shamsi, K. 2010. The effect of sowing date and row spacing on yield and yield components on Hashem chickpea variety under rain fed condition. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(1): 7-11.
29. Tawaha, A.R.M., Turk, M.A., and Lee, K.D. 2005. Adaptation of chickpea to cultural practices in Mediterranean type environment. Research Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 1(2): 152-157.
30. Tewari, A.N., Tewari, S.N., Rathi, J.P.S., Verama, R.N., and Traipathi, A.K. 2001. Crop-weed competition studies in chickpea having Asphodelous tenuifolious dominated weed community under rain-fed condition. Indian Journal of Weed Science 33(3): 198-199.