پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

ارزیابی ارزش زراعی نخود رقم "ساکار"(Cicer arietinum L.) متقاضی تجاری‌سازی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
مؤسسه تحقیقات ثبت و گواهی بذر و نهال. سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران
چکیده
به‌منظور ارزیابی ارزش زراعی و مصرفی لاین جدید نخود (Cicer arietinum L.) به‌نام "ساکار" به‌عنوان رقم منتخب جهت معرفی، آزمایشی در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار طی دو سال زراعی در سه منطقه (ارومیه، نقده و کرج) اجرا شد. در طول فصل رشد، داده‌برداری براساس دستورالعمل آزمون ارزش زراعی انجام گردید و صفات زراعی، عملکرد و ویژگی‌های کیفی نخود رقم ساکار مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. براساس نتایج به‌دست‌آمده، رقم ساکار با میانگین 4/154 روز تا گل‌دهی و 7/190 روز تا رسیدگی جزو ارقام دیررس طبقه‌بندی شد. ارتفاع اولین غلاف از سطح زمین در این رقم (5/20 سانتی‌متر) به‌طور معنی‌داری بیشتر از میانگین ارتفاع اولین غلاف در سایر ارقام (8/17 سانتی‌متر) بود که برای برداشت مکانیزه یک مزیت محسوب می‌شود. رقم ساکار با میانگین 05/7 شاخه در بوته، شاخه‌دهی بالایی داشت. اگرچه میانگین تعداد غلاف در بوته در رقم ساکار کمتر از میانگین سایر ارقام بود، امّا میانگین تعداد دانه در غلاف (15/1 عدد) و میانگین وزن 100 دانه (37 گرم) در این رقم بالاتر بود. شاخص جذب آب (19/1 درصد) و شاخص تورم دانه (23/2) در رقم ساکار حدواسط سایر ارقام بود. از نظر زمان پخت نیز رقم ساکار با میانگین زمان پخت 3/38 دقیقه در گروه دانه­های با زمان پخت متوسط طبقه‌بندی شد. به‌طور کلی، نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که رقم ساکار به‌دلیل سهولت برداشت مکانیزه ناشی از ارتفاع بیشتر اولین غلاف و نیز بازارپسندی بالاتر حاصل از تولید دانه‌های نسبتاً درشت می‌تواند در مناطق مشابه با شرایط آزمایش همانند ارقام شاهد به‌عنوان یک ژرم‌پلاسم جدید و کارآمد در توسعه و تولید حبوبات کشور مورد استفاده قرار گرفته و نقش مؤثری در توسعه کشت نخود در کشور ایفا کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Testing Value for Cultivation and Use (VCU) of "Sakar" Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Variety Candidates for Commercialization

نویسندگان English

Babak Darvishi
Hossein Kamari
Saman Sheidaei
Mohammadreza Jazaiery Noushabadi
Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Karaj, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is considered as a valuable legume crop that, in addition to having high nutritional value, is well adapted to rainfed farming conditions. Also, it is one of the most important crops in the semi-arid regions of the world, and is widely cultivated in Iran. In 2023, chickpea cultivation area in Iran is about 423,700 hectares and its production is estimated at more than 175,000 tons with an average yield of 413 kilograms per hectare. Developing new cultivars with superior agronomic performance and desirable consumer traits is essential for increasing yield, improving mechanization efficiency, and enhancing market competitiveness. The Value for Cultivation and Use (VCU) test is a critical step in the registration and commercialization process, as it verifies that new cultivars outperform existing commercial varieties in terms of agronomic performance and quality. The newly developed chickpea cultivar Sakar was selected for evaluation based on its promising morphological and physiological characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the agronomic performance and consumption-related characteristics of the "Sakar" cultivar in comparison with five commercial cultivars in diverse climatic conditions of Iran.

Materials and Methods
This study was conducted during two cropping seasons in three locations: Urmia, Naqadeh, and Karaj. A Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications was used to evaluate the candidate cultivar ‘Sakar’ alongside five control cultivars. Data collection was based on the national VCU testing protocol and phenological traits, yield components and seed quality were evaluated. Post-harvest traits such as water absorption index, seed swelling index and cooking time were measured using standard laboratory methods. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to assess differences among cultivars and mean comparisons were conducted using Duncan’s multiple range test at the 5% significance level. All statistical analyses were carried out using SAS software.

Results and Discussion
The candidate cultivar ‘Sakar’ was later flowering than the other cultivars with 154.4 days to flowering. Sakars flowering time was significantly delayed compared to the average of the other cultivars (152.7 days). ‘Sakar’cultivar with a maturity period of 190.7 days was classified in the late-maturing cultivar group along with ‘Nosrat’ (190.2 days) and ‘Ata’ (189.8 days). The first pod height in ‘Sakar’ (20.5 cm) was significantly higher than the mean of the other cultivars (17.8 cm), which is considered as an advantage for ‘Sakar’ mechanical harvesting. ‘Sakar’ also showed high branching (7.05 branches per plant), similar to ‘Ata’ (7.0) and ‘Nosrat’ (6.77). Although the number of pods per plant in ‘Sakar’ (39.4 pods) was significantly lower than the average of the improved cultivars (49.15 pods), it had the highest number of seeds per pod (1.15) and the highest 100seed weight of 37 g which was ranked in the highest statistical group with 100-seed weight in Saeed (37.9 grams) and Anna (37 grams) cultivars. ‘Sakar’ also produced the highest fresh seed weight (81.3 g) and showed a higher water absorption index (1.19%) compared to the general mean (1.12%). Its dry seed volume (83 mL) was the highest among the cultivars. Based on the seed swelling index (2.23) and cooking time (38.3 minutes), ‘Sakar’ was categorized as an intermediate cultivar. Overall, due to its higher first pod height and relatively large seed size, ‘Sakar’ can serve as an efficient and promising germplasm for breeding and production programs in regions with environmental conditions similar to the study areas.

Conclusions
The candidate cultivar ‘Sakar’ showed impressive agronomic performance in the evaluations; higher first pod height, adequate branching and relatively large seed size were its outstanding features. In addition, the sakar cultivar showed favorable quality traits such as higher grain fresh weight, higher water absorption index and higher grian dry volume. Although this cultivar was ranked at an average level in terms of grain swelling index and cooking time, the combination of all Sakar characteristics indicates that Sakar can be used as an efficient and promising germplasm for breeding and production programs in areas with environmental conditions similar to the experimental sites.

Acknowledgement
This article is extracted from the research project of the Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute under the approved number 04-08-08-050-011221 dated 2025/10/18 which is hereby thanked and appreciated.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Agronomic traits
Large-seeded chickpea
Rainfed cultivation
Variety introduction

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

Ataei Samagh, H., Habibi, H., & Fotoukian, M. H. (2017). Effect of irrigation interval and surfactant application on some morphological and yield traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Environmental Stresses in Agricultural Sciences, 10(1), 31–44. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22077/escs.2017.529
Basiri, S. (2024). A review of the consumption value of legumes in the human diet for ensuring food security. Extension Journal of Legume Agriculture, Kurdistan Agricultural Research Center, 5(1), 1–8. (In Persian).
Ceyhan, E., & Avci, M. A. (2005). Combining ability and heterosis for grain yield and some yield components in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 8, 1447–1452. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2005.1447.1452
Darvishi, B., Eshghi, M., Bahrami, S., Nasiri, H., Azad, R., Khandan, A., Bakhtar, R., & Norouzi, A. (2022). Determining the agronomic value of imported chickpea cultivars compared to Iranian cultivars. Journal of Crops Improvment, 24(2), 337–352. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2021.319116.2517
Edalat, M., Dadkhodaie, A., & Naderi Kharraji, R. (2015). The interrelationships of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) kernel yield and its components under rainfed conditions. Iran Agricultural Research, 34(1), 56-62. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22099/iar.2015.3065
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). (2023). Crops production report. Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org
Gupta, M., Manpreet, K., Inderjit, S., Sarvjeet, S., & Gaur, P. M. (2015). Developing chickpea cultivars suitable for mechanical harvesting. Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, and International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Hyderabad.
Hamidi, A., Baniyani, A., Vafaee-Tabar, M. R., Arab-Salmani, M., Burbur, S., Karimi, F., Mohammadi, S., & Mohajer Abbasi, A. (2021). Evaluation of some genotypes and new cotton cultivars for determining Value for Cultivation and Use (VCU) in Varamin. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, University of Tehran, 23(2), 361–375. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2021.80666
Kakaei, M. (2025). Evaluation of drought tolerance indices of chickpea cultivars in different irrigation regimes. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 35(4), 209-221. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/saps.2024.58603.3122
Katuuramu, D. N., Luyima, G. B., Nkalubo, S. T., Wiesinger, J. A., Kelly, J. D., & Cichy, K. A. (2020). On-farm multi-location evaluation of genotype by environment interactions for seed yield and cooking time in common bean. Scientific Reports, 10, Article 60087. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60087-2
Khan, A. M., Ali, Z., Mohsin, A. U., Soomro, A. A., Hussain, K., Rafiq, M., Hussain, N., Ahmad, Q., Ahmed, I., Khan, M. I., Shaikh, M. N., Matloob, A., Akram, Z., Shabbir, G., Hassan, M. U., Waqas, M. U., Hussain, I., Rani, S., Malik, S. R., Rehman, A. u., Ramsay, G., & Blanchard, C. (2024). Genotype × environment interactions analysis for chickpea grain yield and related traits by a mixed model approach. Discover Agriculture, 2, Article 90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00110-6
Khattak, A. B., Khattak, G. S. S., Mahmood, Z., Bibi, N., & Ihsanullah. (2006). Study of selected quality and agronomic characteristics and their interrelationship in Kabuli-type chickpea genotypes. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 41(S2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01193.x
Mafakheri, K., Fatehi, F., Habibzadeh, M. J., & Ahmadi, S. (2015). Plant Breeding: Specialized courses for M.Sc. level, prepared for Ph.D. entrance exam (Advanced and molecular genetics, advanced plant breeding, plant biotechnology, biometrics, genetics). Dibagaran Tehran Cultural and Artistic Institute. (In Persian).
Mandani, F., & Jalilian, A. (2019). Evaluation of the interaction between sowing date and cultivar on various traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Kermanshah climatic conditions. Plant Production Technology, 19(1), 37–51. (In Persian).
Manjunatha, P. B., Aski, M. S., Mishra, G. P., Gupta, S., Devate, N. B., Singh, A., Bansal, R., Kumar, S., Nair, R. M., & Dikshit, H. K. (2023). Genome-wide association studies for phenological and agronomic traits in mungbean. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, Article 1209288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1209288
Mendler-Drienyovszki, N., Magyar-Tábori, K., Mancinelli, R., Black, L., Brown, H., Allam, M., Udupa, S. M., Atait, M., Novarina, E., Bardelli, T., Hansen, P. K., Cottney, P., & Giulini, A. (2024). Assessing the opportunities and risks of DUS and VCU variety testing for sustainable production through SWOT analysis. Agriculture, 14(10), 1817. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14101817
Ozdemir, S. (1996). Path coefficient analysis for yield and its components in chickpea. International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter, 3, 9–21.
Parkina, O. V., Nguyen, N. T., Yakubenko, O. E., & Wang, Z. F. (2025). Study of gene–environment interactions and ecological stability for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agricultural Reviews, 46(5), 828–832. https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.RF-324
Raziei, T. (2017). Köppen-Geiger climate classification of Iran and investigation of its changes during 20th century. Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, 43, 419–439. https://doi.org/10.22059/JESPHYS.2017.58916
Sadeghzadeh Ahari, D. (2016). Effect of seed size on yield, agronomic traits, and drought tolerance in chickpea. Journal of Crops Improvment, 19(1), 69–85. (In Persian).
Saran, P., Singh, R., & Kumar, A. (2023). Correlation and path coefficient analysis for seed yield and its attributing traits in blackgram. Legume Research, 46(4), 417–420. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4385
Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute (SPCRI). (2009). Guideline for the conduct of Value for Cultivation and Use of chickpea. Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute (SPCRI), Alborz, Iran. 13 p. (In Persian).
Singh, K. B., & Saxena, M. C. (1999). Chickpeas. London: Macmillan Education Ltd, 134 p., 8 p. of plates.
Singh, K. B., Bejiga, G., & Malhotra, R. S. (1990). Associations of some characters with seed yield in chickpea collection. Euphytica, 49, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024133
Sokolović, D., Babić, S., Petrović, M., Solís, I., Cougnon, M., Gutierrez, N., Pärssinen, P., Reheul, D., & Radović, J. (2025). Genotype by environment interactions and phenotypic traits stability of the EUCLEG faba bean collection. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1480110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1480110
Srivastava, A. K., Dixit, G. P., Mohammad Nisar, & Singh, N. P. (2023). Genetic variability and inter-relationships among grain physical and hydration traits in chickpea. Legume Research, 46(5), 664–667. https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-4407
Zibari, P. A. A. (2024). Genotype × environment interaction and coefficient regression in some genotypes of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2), 11850–11862. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00844
 
 
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.

  • تاریخ دریافت 17 دی 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 23 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 24 خرداد 1405
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 24 خرداد 1405