Evaluation of agronomic and morphological traits of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 Faculty of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Seed and Plant Improvement Research Department, Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Khorramabad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is a winter crop and mostly self-pollinated with chromosome number 2n=2x=16 that it is known as one of important source of vegetable protein in the world. It is found that 70% of the total world’s chickpea production belongs to the Asian region. India, Turkey, Pakistan, and Iran are the major countries in Asia that produce chickpea. Iran is an important center of chickpea diversity but the productivity of chickpea in Iran is variable and low, which may be related to limiting climatic factors, water availability, genotype and little breeding work in Iranian chickpea cultivars. The presence of genetic diversity among genotypes indicates the genotypes are a valuable resource to increase product quality and productivity. Analysis of genetic diversity can provide practical information for selection of parental material in plant breeding programs and gene-bank management. The objectives of this study were to evaluate genetic variation among chickpea genotypes and to determine the relationships among agronomic traits with seed yield using analysis of variance, comparison of means, correlation coefficient, step-wise regression and path analysis.
 
Materials & Methods
The experiment was conducted in the city of Khorramabad 2014-2015, in latitude 33 degrees 36 minutes north and longitude 47 degrees and 40 minutes east of the Greenwich meridian is located. Its height from sea level is 1200 meters. Fifteen chickpea genotypes were supplied from Dryland Agricultural Research Institute, Iran and studied for various yield parameters under field conditions in a randomized complete block design with three replications. in present study 21 morphological characteristics such as plant height, number of primary branches, number of secondary branches, number of total pod per plant, number of node per stem, number of one-seed pod, number of two-seed pod, number of empty pod per plant, pod weight (seed+shell), seed weight per plant, 100- seed weight, number of filled pod, seed yield, number of seed per pod, number of seed per plant, biological yield, straw yield, harvest index, total seed weight (seed+straw), dry weight of stem and productivity effort were evaluated.
 
Results & Discussion
The analysis of variance showed highly significant variations (p≤0.01) among genotypes for seed weight per plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield and number of pod per plant characters. According to the mean comparison results, it was found that G8, G9, G1 and G6 genotypes have the highest seed yield respectively and G8, G9 and G13 genotypes have the highest biological yield. The correlation analysis results revealed that seed yield has a highly significant relationship with 100-seed weight, seed weight per plant, the number of pod per plant, the number of one-seed pod, the number of seed per plant and weight of pod (seed+shell) but there is a negative correlation between seed yield and straw yield. Also, there is positive and significant correlation between biological yield and total seed weight (seed+straw), 100-seed weight, pod weight (seed+shell), seed weight per plant, dry weight of stem, plant height, the number of seed per plant, the number of primary branches and the number of total pod per plant. Results of stepwise regression analysis for seed yield as a dependent variable and the other traits as independent variables showed that 100% of total variation of seed yield justified by the number of one-seed pod, pod weight (seed+shell) and 100-seed weight
traits. The path analysis confirmed that weight of pod (seed+shell) has the maximum positive direct influence on seed yield plant and 100-seed weight and number of one-seed pod also exhibited a considerable indirect effect on the seed yield through the weight of pod (seed+shell). Finally, the results of simple correlation, stepwise regression and path analysis in this experiment showed the 100-seed weight, weight of pod (seed+shell) and number of one-seed pods had the greatest effect on seed yield.
 
Conclusion
With regard to the result of mean comparison, it can be concluded that G8 and G9 genotypes from the studied genotypes are better based on seed yield and biological yield. Also, stepwise regression and path analysis results showed that pod weight (seed+shell), 100-seed weight and one-seed pod traits would be the appropriate selection criteria for better seed yield in chickpea.

Keywords


  1. Aggarwal, H., Rao, A., Singh, J., Rana, J.S., Naik, P.K., and Chhokar, V. 2015. Assessment of genetic diversity among 125 cultivars chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) of Indian origin using ISSR markers. Turkish Journal of Botany 39: 218-226.
  2. Ahmad, Z., Mumtaz, A.S., Nisar, M., and Khan, N. 2012. Diversity analysis of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm and its implications for conservation and crop breeding. Agriculture Sciences 3 (5): 723-731.
  3. Aliu, S., Kaul, H.P., Rusinovci, I., ShalaMayrhofer, V., Fetahu, S., and Zeka, D. 2016. Genetic diversity for some nutritive traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) from different regions in Kosova. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 21 (1): 156-161.
  4. Babaie Zarch, M.J., Fotokian, M.H., and Mahmoodi, S. 2013. Evaluation of genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L) genotypes for morphological traits using multivariate analysis methods. Journal of Crop Breeding 5 (12): 85-98. (In Persian with English Summary).
  5. Backouchi, I.Z., Aouida, M., Khemiri, N., and Jebara, M. 2015. Genetic diversity in Tunisian populations of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) based on morphological traits and molecular markers. Genetics and Molecular Research 14 (3): 7587-7596.
  6. Bakhshipour, S., Gazanchian, A., Mohaddesi, A., Rahimsouroush, H., and Nasiri, M. 2013. Genotypic and phenotypic correlations between grai yield and some agronomic traits in promising rice lines. Agronomy Journal (Pajohesh & Sazandegi) 97: 82-90. (In Persian with English Summary).
  7. Chegamirza, Sh., Chegamirza, K., and Mohammadi, R. 2012. Study of genetic variation in cultivars and landraces of chickpea based on agronomic traits in dryland conditions. Journal of Dry Farming 1 (1): 108-119. (In Persian).
  8. Dashtaki, M., Bihamta, M.R., and Mohammad Ali Pour Yamchi, H. 2012. Evaluation of genetic diversity and morphological traits of Kabuli and Desi chickpea germplasm. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 3 (1): 7-16. (In Persian with English Summary).
  9. Ebrahimi, P., Farshadfar, E., and Farshadfar, M. 2011. Relationships between agronomic and physiologic traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) lines in normal and drought tension conditions. 5th National Conference on New Ideas in Agriculture, February 16-17, 2011. Islamic Azad University Branch of Kermanshah. (In Persian with English Summary).
  10. Fazeli, F., and Chegamirza, K. 2011. Genetic Variation in Iranian Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. Kabuli Type) Based on Agronomic Traits and RAPD Marker. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 4: 555-579. (In Persian with English Summary).
  11. Ghaffari, P., Talebi, R., and Keshavarzi, F. 2014. Genetic diversity and geographical differentiation of Iranian landrace, cultivars and exotic chickpea lines as revealed by morphological and microsatellite markers. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 20 (2): 225-233.
  12. Hajibarat, Z., Saidi, A., Hajibarat, Z., and Talebi, R. 2014. Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of landrace and improved chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes using morphological and microsatellite markers. Environmental and Experimental Biology 12: 161-166.
  13. Keshavarznia, R., Mohammadi Nargesi, B., and Abbasi, A.R. 2013. The study of genetic variation of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on morphological traits under normal and stress conditions. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 44 (2): 305-315. (In Persian with English Summary).
  14. Mallu, T.S., Mwangi, S.G., Nyende, A.B., Ganga Rao, N.V.P.R., Odeny, D.A., Rathore, A., and Kumar, A. 2014. Assessment of genetic variation and heritability of agronomic traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research 5 (4): 76-88.
  15. Mirzaei Heidari, M., Maleki, A., Tahmasebi, A., and Fazel, S.H. 2011. Effect of plant density on yield and yield components of dryland chickpea cultivars under autumn and spring sowing in Ilam. Journal of Research in Crop Sciences 3(12): 41-56. (In Persian with English Summary).
  16. Mohammadi, K., and Talebi, R. 2015. Interrelationships and genetic analysis of seed yield and morphological traits in mini core collection of Iranian landrace, breeding lines and improved chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Genetika 47(2): 383-393.
  17. Motavassel, H. 2013. Grouping phonological and morphological characteristics of chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.) Ardebil region using cluster analysis and detection function. International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences 2(23): 1091-1094.
  18. Naghavi, M.R., Rashidi Monfared, S., and Humberto, G. 2012. Genetic diversity in Iranian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces as revealed by microsatellite markers. Czecg Journal Genetics and Plant Breeding 48(3): 131-138.
  19. Naroui Rad, M.R., Aghaei, M.J., Fanaei, H.R., and Ghasemi, M.M. 2008. The study of genetic variation of some morphologic and phenologic characters in lentil germplasms of warm and dry regions. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 78: 173-181. (In Persian with English Summary).
  20. Nasri, R., Heidari Moghadam, A., Siadat, A.A., Paknejad, F., and Sadeghi Shoae, M. 2012. Path analysis of traits correlation and supplemental irrigation on yield and yield components of chickpea in Ilam. Iranian Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding 8(2): 161-172. (In Persian with English Summary).
  21. Nisar, M., Ghafoor, A., Rashid Khan, M., Ahmad, H., Qureshi, A.S., and Ali, Haidar. 2007. Genetic diversity and geographic relationship among local and exotic chickpea germplasm. Pakistan Journal of Botany 39(5): 1575-1581.
  22. Ramanappa, T.M., Chandrashekara, K., and Nuthan, D. 2013. Analysis of variability for economically important traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences 1(3): 133-140.
  23. Rezaeian Zadeh, E., Parsa, M., Ganjali, A., and Nezami, A. 2011. Responses of yield and yield components of chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.) to supplemental irrigation in different phenology stages. Journal of Water and Soil 25 (5): 1080-1095. (In Persian with English Summary).
  24. Saleem, M., Tahir, H.N., Kabir, R., Javid, M., and Shahzad, K. 2002. Interrelationships and path analysis of yield attributes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 4 (3): 404-406.
  25. Tesfamichael, S.M., Githiri, S.M., Nyende, A.B., and Rao, N.V.P.R. 2015. Variation for agro-morphological traits among Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Journal of Agricultural 7(7): 75-92.
  26. Vaghar, M.S., Nourmohamadi, Gh., Shamsi, K., Pazki, A.R., and Kebraee, S. 2010. Effect of sowing time on yield and yield components of dryfarming chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Kermanshah region. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding 5(1): 1-18 (In Persian with English Summary).
CAPTCHA Image