Evaluation Plant Yield and Yield Components of Chickpea and Quinoa under Nitrogen and Intercropping Ratios of Chickpea and Quinoa

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

• Elham Raftari
• Ali Nakhzari Moghaddam
• Mehdi Mollashahi
• Ebrahim Gholamalipour Alamdari

Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Gonbad Kavous, Gonbad Kavous, Iran

10.22067/ijpr.2023.84081.1064

Abstract

Introduction
The practice of growing two or more crops simultaneously in the same field is called intercropping and it is a common feature in traditional farming of small landholders. It provides farmers with a variety of returns from land and labor, often increases the efficiency with which scarce resources are used, and reduces the failure risk of a single crop that is susceptible to environmental and economic fluctuation. There is another important way that without incurring additional costs and use of water and fertilizer could result in higher production. This approach is increasing agricultural production per unit area by growing more than one crop in a year. Intercropping will be successful when competition for sources is less than competition within a species. Plants in the mixture can be chosen in a way that a species benefits from environmental changes caused by other species in mixed cultures directly. Intercropping inhibits the growth and development of weeds and leads to increased production. Since the system will reduce pesticide use, environmental pollution will be also less proportionally. The objective of the present study was to study some traits of chickpea (plant height, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, number of seeds per plant, 100-seed weight, and plant yield,) under application of nitrogen and planting pattern of chickpea and quinoa.
 
Materials and Methods
In order to study the effect of nitrogen and intercropping ratios of chickpea and quinoa on some traits of chickpeas, a factorial experiment based on randomized complete Block design (RCBD) was conducted with three replications at Gonbad Kavous University farm during the 2020-2021 growing season. Nitrogen factor was included three levels of non-application and application of 25 and 50 kg N/ha and the treatments of planting pattern were included 9 levels of sole cropping of chickpea, 67 % chickpea + 33 % quinoa, 50% chickpea + 50% quinoa, 33% chickpea + 67% quinoa, 100% chickpea + 33% quinoa, 100% chickpea + 50 % quinoa, 100% chickpea + 67% quinoa, 100% chickpea + 100% quinoa and sole cropping of quinoa. In sole cropping, the distance between the plants on the row for chickpea and quinoa was 10 cm. The operation of harvesting the entire plot was done by removing the border rows and half a meter from both sides of the middle rows. For analysis variance of data software of SAS Ver.9.1.3 was used and treatment mean differences were separated by the least significant difference (LSD) test at the 0.05 probability level.
 
Results and Discussion
The results of analysis variance showed that planting pattern and nitrogen had a significant effect on plant height, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, number of seeds per plant, 100-seed weight, and plant yield chickpea and also plant height, number of seeds per plant, 1000-seed weight, and plant yield quinoa. Plant height in additive intercropping was more than in replacement intercropping but the number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, number of seeds per plant, 100-seed weight, seed weight per plant, and pods weight per plant in replacement treatments and sole cropping of chickpea was more than additive treatments. Nitrogen application increased all traits. Plant yield of quinoa in replacement intercropping of 33% quinoa instead of chickpea was greater than other treatments. However, the plant yield of chickpea in sole cropping of chickpea and replacement intercropping of 33% quinoa instead of chickpeas with 14.11 and 13.26 respectively, which was greater than other treatments.
 
Conclusions
Plant height in additive intercropping treatments was more than in replacement intercropping but the number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, number of seeds per plant, 100-seed weight, plant yield, and plant dry weight in replacement treatments and sole cropping of chickpea was more than additive treatments.

Keywords

• Additive intercropping
• Pod
• Replacement intercropping
• Seed weight

---

©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

Abugoch, L., Castro, E., Tapia, C., Añón, M.C., Gajardo, P., & Villarroel, A. (2009). Stability of quinoa flour proteins (Chenopodium quinoa. Willd.) during storage. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 44(10), 2013-2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02023.x

Ahlawat, I.P.S., & Gangaiah, B. (2010). Effect of land configuration and irrigation on sole linseed (Linum usitatissimum) intercropped chickpea (Cicer arietenum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 80(3), 250-253.

Ahmadvand, G., & Hajinia, S. (2015). Ecological aspects study of replacement intercropping patterns of soybean (Glycine max L.) and millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Journal of Agroecology, 7(4), 485-498. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v7i4.43744

Akhtar M.F.Z., Jamil, M., Ahamd, M., & Abbasi, G.H. (2017). Evaluation of biofertilizer in combination with organic amendments and rock phosphate enriched compost for improving productivity of chickpea and maize. Soil Environmental, 36(1), 59-69.

Akhtar, M., Yaqub, M., Iqbal, Z., Ashraf, M.Y., Akhter, J., & Hussain, F. (2010). Improvement in yield and nutrient uptake by cocropping of wheat and chickpea. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(6), 4043-4049.

Ali, E.A. (2011). Impact of nitrogen application time on grain and protein yields as well as nitrogen use efficiency of some two-row barley cultivars in sandy soil. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 10, 425-433.

Alibakhshi, E., & Mirzakhani, M. (2016). Mixed cropping of legumes and maize by the use of urea. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 10(3), 567-584. (In Persian with English Abstract)

Alizadeh, Y., Koocheki, A., & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2010). Investigating of growth characteristics, yield, yield components and potential weed control in intercropping of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and vegetative sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Journal of Agroecology, 2(3), 383-397. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v2i3.7652

Barker, A.V. (2016). Science and Technology of Organic Farming. Emam Reza University, Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian).

Chapagain, T., & Riseman, A. (2014). Barley-pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformations. Field Crops Research, 166, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.014

Crabtree, R.J., Prater, J.D., & Mbolda, P., (2000). Long-term wheat soybean and grain sorghum double-cropping under rainfed conditions. Agronomy Journal, 82, 683-686. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200040007x

Dai, J., Qiu, W., Wang, N., Wang, T., Nakanishi, H., & Zuo, Y. (2019). From leguminosae/gramineae intercropping systems to see benefits of intercropping on iron nutrition. Frontiers in plant science, 10, 605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00605

Darbaghshahi, M.N., Banitaba, A., & Bahari, B. (2012). Evaluating the possibility of saffron and chamomile mixed culture. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(20), 3060-3065. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.999

Doaei, F., Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., Rahemi Karizaki, A., & Aldaghi, M. (2019). Chemical and biological fertilizer management of nitrogen effects on yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in different planting dates. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 10(1), 28-39. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/ijpr.v10i1.60084

Esmaeilian, Y., & Amiri, M.B. (2021). Agronomic and economic evaluation of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinium L.) intercropping under micronutrient applications. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 15(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.30495/jcep.2021.681003. (In Persian with English Abstract)

Ghorbani, R., Tabrizi, L., Koocheki, A., & Nassiri Mahallati, M., (2010). Field and laboratory investigations in agroecology. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press, Iran. p. 372 (In Persian)

Gill, S., Abid, M., & Azam, F. (2009). Mixed cropping effects on growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietenum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41(3), 1029-1036.

Hasan Zadeh Avval, F., Koocheki, A., Khazaei, H., & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2010). Effect of density on savory (Satureja hortensis L.) yield and cultural traits intercropped with Persian clover (Trifolium resupinatum L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 8(6), 920-929. (In Persian)

Khajehpour, M.R. (2014). Principles and fundamentals of crop production (3^rd Ed.). Jahad Daneshgahi Isfahan University of Technology, Iran. (In Persian with English Abstract)

Khalilzade, H., Jahan, M., & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2016). Estimation of corn (Zea mays L.) yield and soil nitrogen via soil electrical conductivity measurement treated with organic, chemical and biological fertilizers. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 13(4), 786-796. (In Persian with English Abstract)

Maffei, M., & Mucciarelli, A. (2003). Essential oil yield in peppermint/soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 84, 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00092-3

Mahmoodi, G., Ghanbari, A., & Hossein Panahi, F. (2014). Investigation of multiple competitions of weeds at different corn (Zea mays L.) densities. Iranian Journal of Crops Research, 12(1), 118-126. (In Persian with English Abstract)

Mushagalusa, G.N., Ledent J.F., & Draye, X. (2008). Shoot and root competition in potato/maize intercropping: effects on growth and yield. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 64, 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.05.008

Najafi, S., & Keshtehgar, A. (2014). Effect of intercropping on increase yield. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 8(5), 549-552.

Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., Salehi Sheikhi, M., Rahemi Karizi, A., & Mohammad Esmaili, M. (2019). The investigation of yield and seed protein of pea cultivars, total yield and LER in intercropping with spinach. Journal of Crops Improvement, 21(4), 435-445. (In Persian with English Abstract)

Nasr Esfahani, M., & Mostajeran, A. (2014). Evaluation of symbiotic effects of different strains of Mesorhizobium cicer on drought stress tolerance of chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.). Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh and Sazandegi), 103(3), 123-131. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/aj.2014.101213

Raei, Y., Bolandnazar, S.A., & Dameghsi, N. (2011). Evaluation of common bean and potato densities effects on potato tuber yield in mono-cropping and intercropping systems. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 21(2), 131-142. (In Persian with English Abstract)

Raftari, E., Nakhzari Moghaddam, A., Mollashahi, M., & Hosseini Moghaddam, H., (2019). The effect application of nitrogen level and intercropping ratios of pea (Pisum sativum) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Iranian Journal of Pulses Research, 10(1), 171-181.  (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/ijpr.v10i1.65544

Ren, Y., Liuc, J., Wangd, Z., & Zhanga, S. (2016). Planting density and sowing proportions of maize-soybean intercrop affected competitive interactions and water-use efficiencies on the Loess Plateau, China. European Journal of Agronomy, 72, 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.10.001

Ruhlemann, L., & Schmidtke, K. (2015). Evaluation of mono-cropped and intercropped grain legumes for cover cropping in no-tillage and reduced tillage organic agriculture. European Journal of Agronomy, 65, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2015.01.006

Scalise, A., Tortorella, D., Pristeri, A., Petrovicov, B., Gelsomino, A., Lindstrom K., & Monti. M. (2015). Legume barley intercropping stimulates soil N supply and crop yield in the succeeding durum wheat in a rotation under rainfed conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 89, 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.003

Soleimanpour, L., Ruhollah Naderi, R., & Najafi-Ghiri, M. (2018). Nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium uptake by crops and weeds in various cereals-legume intercropping systems. Journal of Plant Process and Function Iranian Society of Plant Physiology, 7(24), 229-246. (In Persian with English Abstract)

Sosulski, F.W., & Holt. N.W. (1988). Amino acid composition and nitrogen-to-protein factors for grain legumes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 60, 1327–1331. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps80-187

Undie, U.L., Uwah, D.F., & Attoe, E.E. (2012). Effect of intercropping and crop arrangement on yield and productivity of late season maize/soybean mixtures in the humid environment of south southern Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(4), 37-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n4p37

Yildirim, E., & Turan, M. (2013). Growth, yield and mineral content of broccoli intercropped with lettuce. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 23(3), 919-922.

Zarifpour, N., Naseri. M. T., & Nassiri Mahallati, M. (2014). Evaluate the effect of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) on quantity and quality characteristics of species. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(1), 34-43. (In Persian with English Abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v12i1.36635