مقایسه عملکرد و کارآیی مصرف آب سه رقم نخود در شرایط دیم و آبیاری تکمیلی

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسنده

• امیرهوشنگ جلالی

بخش تحقیقات علوم زراعی-باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

10.22067/ijpr.v10i1.62160

چکیده

به منظور مقایسه دو شیوه کشت دیم و کشت با یک مرحله آبیاری تکمیلی بر عملکرد و کارآیی مصرف آب سه رقم نخود پژوهشی در سال 94-1393 در ایستگاه تحقیقات کشاورزی رزوه (شهرستان چادگان- اصفهان) انجام شد. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل دو روش کاشت (دیم و کاشت با یک نوبت آبیاری) به عنوان کرت اصلی و سه رقم نخود (آزاد، هاشم و آرمان) به عنوان کرت­های فرعی در نظر گرفته شدند. آزمایش به صورت کرت­های خردشده با طرح پایه بلوک­ کامل تصادفی در چهار تکرار انجام شد. نتایج نشان دادند دو روش کاشت از نظر عملکرد، اجزای عملکرد و کارآیی مصرف آب با هم تفاوت معنی­دار داشتند. رقم آزاد در شرایط دیم و آبیاری تکمیلی به ترتیب با 7/605 و 8/899کیلوگرم در هکتار به طور معنی­داری (در سطح احتمال 5‌درصد) عملکرد بالاتری نسبت به دو رقم دیگر تولید نمود. صرف نظر از نوع رقم، شاخص برداشت در شرایط دیم نسبت به شرایط آبیاری تکمیلی افزایش معنی­داری نشان داد و رقم آزاد از بیشترین مقدار شاخص برداشت ( 5/34‌درصد) برخوردار بود. سه رقم آزاد، هاشم و آرمان به ازای هر میلی‌متر آبیاری تکمیلی به ترتیب 88/5، 68/4 و 44/5کیلوگرم عملکرد اضافی (نسبت به شرایط دیم) تولید کردند. به طور خلاصه استفاده از رقم آزاد و انجام آبیاری تکمیلی نسبت به دو رقم دیگر نتایج بهتری دربرداشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

• ارتفاع بوته
• تعداد نیام
• شاخص برداشت
• نخود

---

مراجع

1. Abrishamchi, P., Ganjeali, A., and Sakeni, H.2012. Evaluation of morphological traits, proline content and antioxidant enzymes activity in chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum) under drought stress. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 3: 17-30. (In Persian with English Summary).
2. Agricultural S 2014. Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, The First Volume, Agricultural Products, 158 pages. (In Persian).
3. Anjamshoaa, S., Moeinrad, H., and Ebrahimi, H. The effects of different irrigation levels on grain yield and yield components of four chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.) in Mashhad climatic condition. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 2: 69-82. (In Persian with English Summary).
4. Dehghan, A., Zabihi-Afrouz, R., and Hosseini, M. 2009. Water Use Efficiency of Crops for Iran and Compare it with Countries of the W Research Institute of Planning, Economics and Rural Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Tehran, 82 pages. (In Persian).
5. Eivazi, A., Taghikhani, H., Shiralizadeh, SH., Rezaei, M., and Mousavi Anzabi, S.H. Evaluation of response of chickpea genotypes to water deficit at different growth stages by using drought tolerance indices. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 3: 81-92. (In Persian with English Summary).
6. Fang, X., Turner, N.C., Guijun. Y., Fengmin. L., and Siddique, K.H.M .2010. Flower numbers, pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under terminal drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 335-345.
7. 2016. Statistics Crops. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. (verified 15 Sep. 2015).
8. Feri, F., and Nemati, A. 2000. Economic evaluation of supplemental irrigation on rainfed wheat and pulses. p. 211-215, In: Proceedings of 6th Congress of Agriculture and Plant Breeding Science, 13-16 Sep., Mazandaran University. Babolsar, Iran (In Persian).
9. Ganjeali, A., and Nezami, A. 2008. Ecophysiology and Determinative Yield of Pulses. In: M. Parsa and Bagheri (Eds). Pulses, Mashhad University Jihad Press. Iran. Pp.125-170 [In Persian].
10. Goldani, M., and Rezvani, P. 2007. The effects of different irrigation regimes and planting dates on phenology and growth indices of three chickpea cultivars in Mashhad. Journal of Agriculture Science 14: 1-12. (In Persian with English Summary).
11. Imran, A., Mirza, M.S., Shah, T.M., Malik, K.A., and Hafeez, F.Y. 2015. Differential response of Kabuli and Desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils. Frontiers in Microbiology 6: 1-14.
12. Jalota, S.K., Sood, A., and Harman, W.L. 2006. Assessing the response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum ) yield to irrigation water on two soils in Punjab (India): A simulation analysis using the CROPMAN model. Agricultural Water Management 79: 312-320.
13. Lake, L., and Sadras, V.O. 2014. The critical period for yield determination in chickpea. Field Crops Research 168: 1-
14. Leport, L., Turner, N.C., Davies, S.L., and Siddique, K.H.M. 2006. Variation in pod production and abortion among chickpea cultivars under terminal drought. European Journal of Agronomy 24: 236-246.
15. Liu, P., Gan, Y., Warkentinc, T., and McDonald, C. 2003. Morphological plasticity of chickpea in a semiarid environment. Crop Science 43: 426-429.
16. Malhotra, R.S., and Saxena, M.C. 2002. Strategies for overcoming drought stress in chickpea. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas 17: 20-23.
17. Mohammadi, G.H., Ghasemi-Golazani, K., Javanshir, A., and Moghaddam, M. 2007. Effect of water limitation on yield of three chickpea genotypes. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture 2: 109-120. (In Persian with English Summary).
18. Mustafavi, S.H., Ghassemi K., Shafagh-Kalvanagh, J., and Movludi, A. 2013. Effect of irrigation disruption at reproductive stages on grain filling of chickpea cultivars. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 4: 863-868.
19. Oweis, T., Hachum, A., and Pala, M. 2004. Water use efficiency of winter sown chickpea under supplemental irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management 66: 163-
20. Pacucci, G., Troccoli, C., and Leoni, B. 2006. Effect of supplementary irrigation on yield of chickpea genotypes in a Mediterranean climate. International Commission of Agricultural Engineering Journal 8: 1-9.
21. Patel, R.A. 2005. Response of chickpea to irrigation, FYM and sulphur on a sandy clay loam soil. International Journal of Constitutional Law 12: 22-24.
22. Pezeshkpur, P., and Khademi, 2004. Agricultural and genetically strategies for drought resistance in chickpea. Lorestan Agricultural Jahad Organization Issue 11: 88-92. (In Persian).
23. Shaban, M., Mansourifar, C., Ghobadi, M., and Sabaghpoor, S.H. Investigation of phenological and morphological characteristics and correlation them with yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under drought stress and N fertilizer in Kermanshah province. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 4: 59-64. (In Persian with English Summary).
24. Shobeiri, S. 2014. Technical Recommendations Planting and Harvesting Chickpea and Introduction of New V Ministry of Agricultural Jihad, Bureau of Educational Media, Publication Code 6-1-101-93. (In Persian).
25. Smith, R.E. 1981. Supercritical Flow Flumes for Measuring Sediment Laden Flow. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin (1655).
26. Soltania, A., Hajjarpoura, A., and Vadez, V. 2016. Analysis of chickpea yield gap and water-limited potential yield in Iran. Field Crops Research 185: 21-
27. Tadayyon, M.R., and Ghorbaninejad, A.J. Effect of supplementary irrigation and compost application on morphological traits and yield of two chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 3: 31-44. (In Persian with English Summary).
28. Tanner, C.B., and Sinclair, T.R. 1983. Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-research? In H.M. Taylor et al. (Eds.). Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop P (pp. 1-27). American Statistical Association, Madison, WI.
29. Tuba-Bicer, B., Narin, K.A., and Saker, D. 2004. The effect of irrigation on spring-sown chickpea. Journal of Agronomy Asian Network Science 3: 154-158.
30. Vadez, V., Soltani, A., and Sinclair, T.R., 2012. Modeling possible benefits of root related traits to enhance terminal drought adaptation of chickpea. Field Crops Research 137: 108-
31. Zare Mehrjerdi, M., Bagheri, A., Bahrami, A., Nabati, J., and Massomi, A. Evaluation of selection to drought by PEG in hydroponic condition of twelve chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 8: 67-80. (In Persian with English Summary).