اثر تداخل علف‌های‌هرز، تاریخ کاشت و روش کاشت بر رشد، عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد لوبیاقرمز (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه شیراز

2 شیراز

چکیده

به‌منظور ارزیابی تداخل علف‌های‌هرز، تاریخ کاشت و روش کاشت بر رشد، عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد لوبیاقرمز رقم اختر، آزمایشی به‌صورت کرت‌های دوبارخُرد‌شده در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه‌تکرار در سال 1393 در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شیراز انجام شد. کرت‌های اصلی، فرعی و فرعی‌فرعی به‌ترتیب شامل روش کاشت در دو سطح (یک‌ردیفه و دوردیفه) که در دو حالت عدم کنترل و کنترل علف‌های‌هرز در سه تاریخ کاشت (25‌اردیبهشت، 11‌خرداد و 28‌خرداد) انجام شد. ویژگی‌های مورد‌مطالعه شامل تعداد غلاف در بوته، تعداد دانه در غلاف، وزن ‌صد‌دانه، طول غلاف، وزن غلاف، تعداد شاخه فرعی، سطح برگ، عملکرد بیولوژیک و عملکرد دانه بودند. نتایج نشان‌داد که وزن خشک علف‌های‌هرز پهن‌برگ در روش کاشت یک‌ردیفه (76/548‌گرم برمترمربع) به‌طور معنی‌داری بیشتر از روش کاشت دو‌ردیفه (1/183‌گرم برمترمربع) بود، ولی سایر صفات اندازه‌گیری‌شده تحت تأثیر روش کاشت قرار نگرفت. تاریخ کاشت 25‌اردیبهشت و 11‌خرداد در بسیاری از صفات اندازه‌گیری‌شده اختلاف معنی‌داری نداشتند؛ اما در مقایسه با تاریخ کاشت 28‌خرداد برتری داشتند. بر اساس نتایج تجزیه علیّت، تعداد غلاف در بوته، وزن صد‌دانه و عملکرد بیولوژیک بیشترین اثر مستقیم را بر عملکرد دانه داشتند. به‌طور‌کلی، تاریخ کاشت 11‌خرداد با روش کاشت دو‌ردیفه می‌تواند در منطقه باجگاه شیراز پیشنهاد شود.

واژه‌های کلیدی: تاریخ کاشت، تجزیه علیّت، روش کاشت، لوبیا

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of weed interference, sowing date and method on growth, yield and yield components of Red Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

نویسندگان [English]

  • mohsen edalat 1
  • Maryam Kamali 1
  • Seyed Abdolreza Kazemeini 2
  • Bahram Heidari 2
1 Shiraz University
2 Shiraz University
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Red beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with 22-25 % protein and 50-60 % carbohydrates are one of the most important legumes in the world, particularly in some developing countries. It is one of the major sources of vegetable protein. With regard to increasing population and increasing the need of protein, the use of plant resources like red bean with a large amount of protein is growing. Modern agriculture is highly dependent on the use of herbicides. Due to increase in the number of herbicide-resistant weeds and environmental concerns, there have been considerable efforts in designing alternative weed management strategies. Although the use of herbicides is the most popular method for weed control, but the use of integrated weed management (considering other methods like conservation tillage, sowing date and method) as an ecological strategy provides a suitable method to reduce herbicides and as a result, to increase the competitiveness of crops and inhibit weed growth. Therefore, the objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of weed interference, sowing date and method on growth, yield, and yield components of red bean (var. Akhtar).

Materials and Methods
This experiment was conducted in 2014 at the research field of College of Agriculture (Badjgah region), Shiraz University, Iran, NE (lat 29. 40˚ N, long 52.25˚ W). The soil of research area was clay with pH of 6.92. The experiment was carried out in split-split plot arrangement based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. Treatments included two levels of sowing method (single-row and double-row) and three sowing dates (15 May, 1 June, and 18 June) which were performed in weedy and weed-free conditions. Studied features were included leaf area at flowering stage, pod number per plant, seed number per pod, 100-seed weight, pod length, pod weight, number of branches, biological yield, and seed yield. Analysis of variance of the data, correlation, stepwise regression analysis and path analysis was carried out using SAS (2002) software. Duncan´s test was applied to compare means at 5% probability level. Excel (2007) software was used to draw figures.

Results and Discussion
The results showed that dry weight of both broad-leaf and grass weeds in single-row sowing method was higher than double-row. According to previous researches, competitiveness of weeds at single-row planting pattern was higher than double-row planting method and double-row planting method due to better weed overlap with the closure of the canopy and better competition with crops could control weeds. Weed density and dry weight on 18 June were less than 15 May, and 1 June. The results of the influence of planting date and weed interference on sweet corn growth and development Sweet corn was suggested high weed biomass early, which reflected resource availability to the weed community, but low weed biomass late could be the result of a more suppressive crop, lower weed growth rate, or a combination of the two factors. The effect of sowing method was not significant on all traits except for weed dry weight. Also, the effect of sowing date was significant on all traits except for 100-seed weight and number of branches. All the traits on 15 May and 1 June were higher than 18 June. The results of path analysis showed that number of pods per plant, 100-seed weight and biological yield had the highest direct effect on grain yield. According to the results of this experiment, 1June and 15 May sowing date had no significant difference with each other, so these sowing dates could be offered as appropriate sowing dates for red bean in Badjgah region. It should be mentioned that, the Agrotis segetum and Tetranychus urticae activities were higher in early and late season, respectively, and also, density and dry matter of broadleaf weeds were higher on 15 May sowing date (data not shown).

Conclusion
Generally, with regard to importance of sowing date and method to enhance the red beans yield, suitable weed control, sowing on 1 June with double-row sowing method can be recommended specially for Badjgah region.

Key words: Path analysis, Red bean, Sowing date, Sowing method

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Path analysis
  • Red bean
  • Sowing date
  • Sowing method

مراجع

1. Aspasia, P., Anestis, E., Karkanis, C., Bilalis, D.J., and Efthimiadis, P. 2009. The phenomenon of crop weed competition a problem or a key for sustainable weed management? Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 7(2): 861-868.
2. Cox, W.J., Shields, E., and Cherney, J.H. 2008. Planting date and seed treatment effects on soybean in the northeastern United States. Agronomy Journal 100(6): 1662-1665.
3. Egli, D.B., and Bruening, W.P. 2000. Potential of early maturing soybean cultivar in late planting. Agronomy Journal 92(3): 532-537.
4. Emam, Y., and Seghatoleslami, M.J. 2005. Crop Yield, Physiology and Processes. Shiraz University Press. (In Persian).
5. Forcella, F., westgate, M.E., and Warnes, D.D. 1992. Effects of row width on herbicide and cultivation requirements in row crops. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7(1): 161-167.
6. Ghanbari Motlagh, M., Rastgoo, M., Pur Yusef, M., Saba, J., and Afsahi, K. 2011. Effect of sowig date and weed interference on yeild and yeild component of red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars with different growth habitat. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 2(1): 1-20. (In Persian with English Summary).
7. Hemmati, A., Vazan, Q., and Sadeghi Shoaii, M. 2012. Effect of pre-planting irrigation, maize planting pattern and nitrogen on grain yield and yield components of maize cv. SC704. Agronomy and Plant Breeding 8(2): 31-21. (In Persian).
8. Kantolic, A.G., and Slafer, G.A. 2001. Photoperiod sensitivity after flowering and seed number determination in soybean cultivars. Field Crop Research 72(2): 109-118.
9. Khajepoor, M.R. 1997. Principles and Fundamentals of Agronomy. Isfahan University Press. (In Persian).
10. Kiani, M., Yadavi, A., and Movahedi Dehnavi, M. 2012. Interaction effects of planting date and weed competition on yield and yield components of three white Bean cultivars in Semirom. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 2(3): 17-29. (In Persian with English Summary).
11. Loss, S.P., Siddique, K.H.M., and Martin, L.D. 1997. Adaptation of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to dryland Mediterranean-type environments II. Phenology, canopy development, radiation absorption and biomass partitioning. Journal of Field Crops Research 52: 29-41.
12. Majnon Hosseini, N. 2008. Agriculture and Cereal Production. Mashhad University Press (In Persian).
13. Omae, H., Kumar, A., and Shono, M. 2012. Adaptation to high temperature and water deficit in the common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) during the reproductive period. Journal of Botany 2012: 1-7.
14. Parsa, M., and Bagheri, A. 2008. Legumes. Mashhad University Jahad Press. (In Persian).
15. Rahmani, T., Heidari Sharif Abad, H., and Madani, H. 2012. The study of effect plantig date on yeild of red bean cultivars in Aligudarz region. New Finding Agriculture (4): 321-335. (In Persian).
16. Rahnamaie Tak, A., Vaezi, Sh., and Mozafari, J. 2007. Study on correlation and path analysis for seed yield per plant and its dependent traits in red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 76: 80-88. (In Persian with English Summary).
17. Roa, V.S. 2000. Principles of Weed Science. Enfield, NH: Science Publisher.
18. Robinson, S.L., and Wilcox, J.R. 1998. Comparison of determine and indeterminate soybean nearisolines and their response to row spacing and planting date. Crop Science 38(6): 1554-1557.
19. Robinson, A.P., Conley, S.P., Volenec, J.J., and Santini, J.B. 2009. Analysis of high yielding, early-planted soybean in Indiana. Agronomy Journal 101(1): 131-139.
20. Rezvani Moghadam, P., Pourazar, R., and Najafi, H. 2013. Studying the effect of cultivar and seeding rate on weed suppression in single- vs. double-row corn. (Abstract). In: Abstract Book of the 5rd Iranian Weed Science Conference, August 24-26, 2013. University of Tehran-Karaj. p.1444. (In Persian).
21. SAS Institute. 2002. SAS/Stat User’s Guide, Version 9.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
22. Santalla, M., Escribano, M.R., and Deron, A.M. 1993. Correlation between agronomic and immature pod characters in populations of French bean. Plant Breeding Abstract 63(4): 495.
23. Saxena, N.P., Saxena, M.C., and Jhonsen, J. 1996. Adaptation of Chickpea in the West Asia and North Africa Region. ICARDA.
24. Sincik, M., Goksoy, A.T., and Turan, Z.M. 2009. Soybean seed yield performances under different cultural practices. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 33: 111-118.
25. Soghani, M., Vaezi, S., and Sabaghpoor, S.H. 2010. Study on correlation and path analysis for seed yield and its dependent traits in white bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agriculture and Plant Breeding 6: 27-36. (In Persian).
26. Williams, M.M., and Lindquist, J.L. 2007. Influence of planting date and weed interference on sweet corn growth and development. American Society of Agronomy 99: 1066-1072.
27. Yazdi Samadi, B., and Postini, A. 1994. Principles of Crop Production. Publishing Center of Tehran University (In Persian).
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار