اثر تاریخ کاشت‌های دیرهنگام بر ویژگی‌های فیزیولوژیک ارقام باقلا در رامین خوزستان (Vicia faba L.)

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع‌طبیعی رامین خوزستان

2 دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان

3 دانشگاه آزاد واحد دزفول

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی اثر تاریخ کاشت‌های دیرهنگام بر ویژگی‌های فیزیولوژیک ارقام باقلا (Vicia faba L.) آزمایشی به‌صورت کرت‏های یک‏بار خُردشده در قالب طرح پایه بلوک‏های کامل تصادفی با چهار تکرار در سال زراعی 93-1392 در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان اجرا شد. عوامل آزمایشی شامل تاریخ کاشت به‌عنوان فاکتور اصلی (10 مهر، 25 مهر، 10 آبان، 25 آبان و 10 آذر) و دو رقم باقلا هیستال (رقم خارجی) و سرازیری (رقم محلی) به‌عنوان فاکتور فرعی بودند. نتایج نشان داد که صفات مورد بررسی به‌جُز تعداد دانه در غلاف در تاریخ کاشت‏های مختلف با هم اختلاف معنی‏دار داشتند. همچنین دو رقم مورد بررسی از لحاظ تعداد دانه در غلاف، تعداد غلاف در بوته، وزن صددانه و درصد نیتروژن دانه با هم اختلاف معنی‏داری داشتند. برهمکنش تیمارهای آزمایشی بر عملکرد دانه، پایداری غشاء سلول و کلروفیلb معنی‏دار بود. مقایسه میانگین‏ها نشان داد که رقم هیستال دارای تعداد دانه در غلاف بیشتر و رقم سرازیری دارای تعداد غلاف در بوته بیشتری بودند. بیشترین عملکرد دانه به‌ترتیب به تاریخ کاشت دوم و سوم با میانگین عملکرد 3/3979 و 4/3849 کیلوگرم در هکتار و کمترین عملکرد دانه به تاریخ پنجم با میانگین عملکرد 2/1806 کیلوگرم در هکتار اختصاص داشت. به‌طور کلی رقم هیستال در صورت کاشت در تاریخ 10 آبان و رقم سرازیری در صورت کاشت در تاریخ 25 مهر، از عملکرد دانه بیشتری برخوردار بودند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of different sowing dates on physiological characteristics of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) varieties in Khouzestan Ramin

نویسندگان [English]

  • hadis hasanvand 1
  • ataollah Siadat 1
  • mohammad reza Moraditelavat 1
  • seyyed hashem Mousavi 2
  • abdolhamid Karaminejad 3
1 Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University, Khuzestan
2 Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University, Khuzestan
3 Azad University of Dezful
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Determining the proper time for planting under different climate depends on the factors such as rainfall, temperature and length of day which are the most important aspects of crop production. Its importance is because of the severity of these effects on different genotypes to achieve potential production. Because different genotypes respond differently to planting delays. Sowing date usually interacts with other agricultural management. The goal of this study is to find the perfect time to plant so that environmental factors occurring be favorable for germination, seedling establishment and maintenance of the plant and as far as possible, the plant is faced with a decent condition at any stage of growth. In general, higher growth and higher performance is linked to early sowing date.Appropriate integration of crops and varieties are desirable in order to achieve maximum performance. In general, due to the potential capacity for bean cultivation in the Khuzestan region and lack of adequate information concerning the proper sowing date in the area, this research focuses on the effect of delayed sowing dates on physiological features of bean cultivars (Vicia faba L.) in Khuzestan.
Materials and Methods
The experiment was conducted in 2013-2014 at the Research Center of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Ramin in Khuzestan. The region located on 31 degrees 36 minutes north and 48 degrees 53 minutes east, and with a height of 20 meters above sea level and is considered as arid and semi-arid areas. The average rainfall is 169 mm. The experiment was conducted as split-plot arrangement based on randomized complete block design with four replications. Treatments included five sowing dates as the main factor (October 10, October 25, November 10, November 25 and December 10) and two Faba bean varieties (Hystal and Saraziry) was considered as sub plots. To determine the functional components, 10 plants were randomly marked out of each plot and yield components including grains per pod, number of pods per plant and hundred grain weight were measured.
Results and Discussion
The results showed that all features apart from the number of grain per pod were significantly influenced by sowing dates. Also, the two varieties showed significant differences in terms of the number of grain per pod, number of pods per plant, grain weight and grain nitrogen. Significant differences were found through the interaction of treatments for the features of grain yield, cell membrane stability and chlorophyll-b. The highest grain yield was obtained by second and third sowing date, with an average of 3979.3 and 3849.4 kg per hectare respectively, and the lowest yield was shown at the fifth planting date (1806.2 kg per hectare).
Conclusions
It can be deduced from the results that the sowing dates October 25 and December 10 seem more productive in features like grain weight, number of pods per plant, grain yield and chlorophyll due to the better adaption to climate conditions. Meanwhile, late sowing date caused to decrease the number of pods per plant, grain weight, grain yield, relative water content, cell membrane stability and chlorophyll. Comparing different types of bean revealed that Hystal cultivar had better yield with the highest number of grain per pod, grain weight, and a grain per yield of 4345.7 kg/ha. In general, present study showed that the best planting date is November 10 for Hystal cultivar, and October 25 for Saraziry.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cell membrane stability
  • Chlorophyll a, b
  • Delay sowing dates
  • Grain nitrogen
1. Adamsen, F.J., and Coffelt, T.A. 2005. Planting date effects on flowering, seed yield and oil content of rape and crambe cultivars. Crop Science 21: 293-307.
2. Ashraf, M.Y., Azmi, A.R., Khan, A.H., and Ala, S.A. 1994. Effect of water stress on total phenols, peroxidase activity and cholorophyll content in wheat. Actavphysiologiae Plantarum 16(3): 185-191.
3. Dekot, T., Tsoner, T., and Yordanov, I. 2000. Effects of water stress and high temperature stress on the structure and activity of photosynthetic apparatus of zea mays and Helianthus annuus. Photosynthetica 38: 361-366.
4. El-Degwy, I.S., Glelah, A.A., Galaly, A.E.L., and Marwa, K. 2010. Performance of some faba been cultivars as influenced by sowing date and broomrape control. Journal of Agricultural Research 36: 292-313.
5. EL-Metwally, I.M., El-Shahawy, T.A., and Ahmed, M.A. 2013. Effect of sowing dates and some broomrape control treatments on faba bean growth and yield. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 9(1): 197-204.
6. Fathi, G., Enayate Gholizdeh, M.R., and Razzaz, M. 2012. Response of yield and yield components of rapeseed cultivars and planting dates to heat. Journal of Plant Physiology 4(13): 21-36. (In Persian).
7. Hashem Abadi, D., and Sedaghathoor, Sh. 2006. Study of mutual effect of the sowing date and plant density on yield and yield components of winter Vicia faba L. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 12(1): 135-141. (In Persian with English Summary).
8. Hassanzadeh, R.L., Chavoshi, Q., Madani, H., and Asgari, A.H. 2008. Evaluation of the use of manure and irrigation management to increase water use efficiency in corn (Zea mays L.) KSC 704. The new findings Agriculture 3: 225-237. (In Persian).
9. Johnson, B.L., Mackay, K.R., Schneiter, A.A., Hanson, B.K., and Schatz, B.G. 1995. Influence of planting date on canola and Crambe production. Agronomy Journal 8: 594-599.
10. Khadem Hamzeh, H.R., Karimi, M., Rezaie, A., and Ahmadi, M. 2004. Effect of plant density and planting date on agronomic characteristic, yield and yield components in soybean. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Science 35(3): 357-367. (In Persian).
11. Khajehpour, M.R. 2009. Principles of Agriculture. Jahad Daneshghahi, Esfahan, Iran. 386 pp.
12. Koocheki, A., and Banayane Avval, M. 2004. Agriculture Cereal. Jahad Daneshghahi Mashhad Press. 236 pp. (In Persian).
13. Koocheki, A., and Khajeh Hoseyni, M. 1999. Modern Agriculture. Jahad Daneshghahi Mashhad Press. 635 pp. (In Persian).
14. Lopez-Bellido, F.J., Lopez-Bellido, R.J., Kasem Khalil, S., and Lopez-Bellido, L. 2008. Effect of planting date on winter kabuli chickpea growth and yield under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Agronomy Journal 100(4): 957-964.
15. Luts, S., Kinet, J.M., and Bouhanmont, J. 1996. Nacl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Annals of Botany 78: 389-398.
16. Mahlooji, M., Mousavi, F., and Karimi, M. 1999. Effects of water stress and planting date on yield and yield components of bush beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 4(1): 57-67. (In Persian).
17. Masoudi Kia, A., and Azizi, Kh. 2008. Effects of sowing date and plant density on yield and its components and percentage of seed protein in cultivars of red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science 1(2): 1-14. (In Persian with English Summary).
18. Mirzargar, N., Rahimpoor, A., and Abas Nezhad, Gh. 2011. Report of foreign varieties of beans (Vicia faba L.) compared to native culture. Ministry of Agriculture, Mazandaran Province. 6 pp. (In Persian).
19. Mitchell, R.A., Mitchell, V.J., and Lawlor, D.W. 2001. Response of wheat canopy CO2 and water gasexchange to soil water content under ambient and elevated CO2. Global. Change Biology 7: 599-611.
20. Mousavi, Gh., Seghatoleslami, M.J., and Delarami, M.R. 2014. Effect of sowing date and plant density on yield and yield components of lentil (Lens culinaris cv. Sistan). Annual Research & Review in Biology 4(1): 296-305.
21. Naseri, R., Siadat, S.A., Soleymani Fard, A., Soleymani, R., and Khosh khabar, H. 2011. Effects of planting date and density on yield, yield components and protein content of three chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under rainfed conditions in Ilam province. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 2(2): 7-18. (In Persian with English Summary).
22. Pezeshkpour, P., Ahmadi, A.R., and Daneshvar, M. 2007. Effect of sowing date on yield and yield components of leaf chlorophyll index and light interception in the bottom of the canopy. Proceedings of the National Conference on the Legumes. Institute of Plant Sciences. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. 210-211.
23. Rezvani Moghadam, P., Broumnd Rezazadeh, Z., Mohammad Abadi, A.A., and Sharif, A. 2008. Effect of planting dates and different fertilizer treatments on yield, yield components and seed oil castor oil plant. Journal of Agricultural Research 6(2): 303-313. (In Persian).
24. Robertson, M.J., Holland, J.F., and Bambach, R. 2004. Response of canola and Indian mustard to sowing date in the grain belt of north-eastern Australia. Australia Journal of Experimental Agricultural 44: 43-52.
25. Sadeghipour, A., and Aghaei, P. 2011. Effect of different sowing dates on chlorophyll content, intercepted radiation and leaf area index of chickpea genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Research 3(1): 25-39. (In Persian with English Summary).
26. Salehi, M., Akbari, R., and Khorshidi Benam, M.B. 2008. Responses of yield and yield components of Red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 43(1): 105-115. (In Persian).
27. Sanchez-Rodrıguez, E., Rubio-Wilhelmi, M., Cervilla, L.M., Blasco, B., Rios, J.J., Rosales, M.A., Romero, L., and Ruiz, J.M. 2010. Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Science 178: 30-40.
28. Sandhu, T.S., Gumber, R.K., Bhullar, B.S., and Bhatia, R.S. 1989. Genetical analysis of grain protein, grain yield and its components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal Research Punjab Agriculture University.
29. Shahsavari, M.R., Rezaei, A., and Khajehpour, M.R. 1993. Effect of planting date on yield and yield components of beans. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 24(1): 53-63. (In Persian).
30. Wahid, A., Gelani, S., Ashraf, M., and Foolad, M.R. 2007. Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61: 199-223.
31. Wajid, A., Hussain, A., Maqsood, M., Ahmad, A., and Awais, M. 2002. Influence of sowing date and irrigation levels on groth and grain yield of wheat. Pakestan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 39(1).
CAPTCHA Image